radeon driver heading in wrong direction :-(.

[Ed Greshko]

Gilboa Davara wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 20:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>   
>> In my case, none of the above...
>>     
>
> Oh, come on!
> I'm using the same binary driver as you are.
> And yes, nVidia binary driver, while -far- better than ATI's driver, has
> had it's share of issues.
> E.g.
> - Initial F12 xorg + nVidia driver combo resulted in unbelievably slow
> performance under KDE.
> - Legacy driver releases tend to lag the "current" driver badly. In a
> desktop, you could always switch to the latest version, but you laptop
> still carries a GF5600M, you're more or less screwed.
> - Xen kernel were never supported by nVidia.
> - Having to compile a kernel without 4K stacks for months, until nVidia
> added support for it.
>
>  .... Again, nVidia is doing an admirable job at keeping their drivers
> stable and current (compared to say, ATI or Intel Poulsbo), but claiming
> the using them do not come at a price, is ridicules, at best.
>
>
>   
I said, "in my case" none of the above.  So, unless you know the details
of "my case"....


-- 
Having to manually track the satellite.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100131/78c41582/attachment.bin