Hi,
I remeber s similar problem (with a similar DS), where import was
looping on the same entry and just starting a new pass again. It was a
problem in the import queue regulation, but to closer debug this we
would neeed more data. What you could do is to try to change the cache
sizes, which can have an effect on buffer size and hit ratio.
Regards,
Ludwig
On 01/30/2014 07:57 PM, Paul Whitney wrote:
That is a very good question. No cannot provide any of those items.
I was just hoping maybe there would be some "known undocumented
trick" to kickstart this server. Perhaps the next time Kent L. comes
out here he can take a look and see if there is anything that stands out.
Paul M. Whitney
E-mail: paul.whitney(a)mac.com
On Jan 30, 2014, at 01:32 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/30/2014 11:33 AM, Paul Whitney wrote:
>> Guys I appreciate you help in this issue. I unfortunately am
>> hosting on a disconnected network and cannot post any of the
>> information you are requesting without in essence "re-typing" it all
>> in. In the interest of saving time, I am just reinitializing the
>> directory server. In the past this has worked.
>>
>> For the record, this db2index function does work fine on the RHDS
>> 8.2. But on both RHDS 9.0 and 9.1, it appears to get stuck. Even
>> after killing the process, the server attmepts to resume the process
>> but makes no progress.
>
> If we cannot get large logs or debug traces, how do you suggest going
> about solving this problem?
> Can you give us your databases and index configuration?
>
> I know for a fact that db2index works on RHDS 9.1, with very large
> databases. So the problem them becomes - what is it about your data
> and/or configuration that is causing problems?
>
>>
>> Paul M. Whitney
>> E-mail:paul.whitney@mac.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 30, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins(a)redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/30/2014 10:17 AM, David Boreham wrote:
>>>> On 1/30/2014 10:18 AM, Paul Whitney wrote:
>>>>> rpm -q 389-ds-base
>>>>> 389-ds-base-1.2.11.15-30.el6_5.x86_64
>>>>> No errors, just a status:
>>>>> reindex userRoot: Processed 315000 entries (pass 11) -- avg rate
>>>>> 15283456.5/sec, recent rate 0.0/sec. hit ration 0%
>>>>> Then errors log states threshold has dropped belo 50%, ending pass
>>>>> 11, sweeps files for merging later, then restarts with pass 12.
>>>> First thing to determine is : is it "stuck" for some reason,
or
>>>> actually performing work ?
>>>> Could you note and post here the machine load in the sulking period --
>>>> CPU, I/O stats, e.g the output from "iostat -x 1" ?
>>>> Also, if you could grab some process thread stack captures (use
>>>> "pstack" , or gdb) from the indexing process and post the
highlights
>>>> here, that might give some insight into what's going on.
>>>
>>> Yes, using the Debugging_Hangs instructions:
>>>
http://port389.org/wiki/FAQ#Debugging_Hangs
>>>
>>>> The output from "strace -p xxx" run on the indexing process
could also
>>>> be useful, but probably less useful than the information mentioned
>>>> above.
>>>> --
>>>> 389 users mailing list
>>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>>> <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users