Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2006, 21:37 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
>On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 20:58 +0530, Tejas Dinkar wrote:
>
>>However, the messages from the RedHat Mailman does not contain ANY
>>Reply-To header AT ALL...
>
>The Fedora Extras mailing list has the Reply-To header, and people
>(including me) consider it broken.
>
Problem with the current scenario is that there is no project wide
policy on this.
And that's IMHO a problem. I'm used to click on "Reply" for nearly all
fedora-lists; but this is one of those few that is different. I nearly
send two mails directly to people instead of to the list due to this.
But no Reply-to munging IMHO this is the correct way. Sankarshan gave
the links to
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml
already, I'll do it once more because it is cheap ;-)
Either way would piss of some people who consider the
alternative the One True Way (TM) but atleast we will be consistent
about this.
Agreed.
/me modifies "To:" of this mail because /me accidentally clicked on
"reply" to generate this mail, too.
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>