On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berrange@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:37:32PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
Pete Zaitcev also has pointed out that Swift probably won't play nicely with this, as the URL scheme is pretty much driven by Amazon, and it assumes a top level URL along the lines of
http://test-1235163301.kvm-rei.zaitcev.lan/testdata https://s3.amazonaws.com/test-1235163301/testdata http://kvm-rei.zaitcev.lan/test-1235163301/testdata
If Swift is the only exception, then we would probably be ok, since I think our other top level name prefixes would be unique enough to not clash with what Swift used at the top level
Even more, Swift should be a separate hostname, so clashing would only be a possibility in all-in-one which is a toy/development setup.
Alan