There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone?
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:46 AM, Justin M. Forbes jforbes@redhat.com wrote:
There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone?
That makes it about 22:00 BST and 23:00 Central European time. If it could be earlier it might get more people from Europe. For me anything that late tends to be a train wreck.
Peter
There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone?
I have never been able to attend any of the meetings as I am GMT+8 in Singapore. I would like to suggest perhaps we do the meeting at 1400 GMT (1000 EST, 0700 PST, 2200 SGT).
Thanks.
Harish
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:46:22PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone?
I've found that using a web app like http://whenisgood.net is far superior than general calls for people's schedules, which are hard to collate via an email list.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:42:29AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:46:22PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone?
I've found that using a web app like http://whenisgood.net is far superior than general calls for people's schedules, which are hard to collate via an email list.
Thanks for the great idea :) Okay, if everyone could respond to http://whenisgood.net/i4nhgw we can see what time works best. Thanks.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:38:45AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:42:29AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:46:22PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone?
I've found that using a web app like http://whenisgood.net is far superior than general calls for people's schedules, which are hard to collate via an email list.
Thanks for the great idea :) Okay, if everyone could respond to http://whenisgood.net/i4nhgw we can see what time works best. Thanks.
After getting a good bit of feedback, it seems like the best time was our original time, before the DST adjustment. So lets do Thursdays at 16:00 EST.
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:19:29AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:38:45AM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 08:42:29AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:46:22PM -0500, Justin M. Forbes wrote:
There has been a lack of participation at our weekly meeting the past couple of weeks. I am wondering if Thursdays at 17:00EST is still a good time for everyone, or if we would get better participation at some other time. Would another time perhaps work better for everyone?
I've found that using a web app like http://whenisgood.net is far superior than general calls for people's schedules, which are hard to collate via an email list.
Thanks for the great idea :) Okay, if everyone could respond to http://whenisgood.net/i4nhgw we can see what time works best. Thanks.
After getting a good bit of feedback, it seems like the best time was our original time, before the DST adjustment. So lets do Thursdays at 16:00 EST.
Err, make that 16:00 EDT (20:00 UTC).
-
Harish Pillay -
Justin Forbes -
Paul W. Frields -
Peter Robinson