Request for review of blocking deliverables for Fedora 25

[Jan Kurik]

Hi Cloud/Atomic WG,

I would like to request review of the WG deliverables for Fedora 25
release. The list of deliverables is available on wiki:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/ReleaseBlocking/Fed...
Please let me know, or edit the wiki page, in case there are missing
deliverables or the current ones have wrong blocking status.

There is going to be overall review done by FESCo, probably on
2016-Sep-30 for all the blocking deliverables.

Thanks and Best Regards,
Jan

[Jan Kurik]

Hi,

may I request any feedback on this topic, and/or adding this topic to
the next Cloud WG meeting agenda ?

Thanks,
Jan

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Jan Kurik  wrote:
> Hi Cloud/Atomic WG,
>
> I would like to request review of the WG deliverables for Fedora 25
> release. The list of deliverables is available on wiki:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/ReleaseBlocking/Fed...
> Please let me know, or edit the wiki page, in case there are missing
> deliverables or the current ones have wrong blocking status.
>
> There is going to be overall review done by FESCo, probably on
> 2016-Sep-30 for all the blocking deliverables.
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Jan
> --
> Jan Kuřík
> Platform & Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic

[Colin Walters]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 04:14 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> may I request any feedback on this topic, and/or adding this topic to
> the next Cloud WG meeting agenda ?

It'd be nice to make Atomic Host a blocking deliverable - I think
we have sufficient experience now and manpower to do that.

[Jan Kurik]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Colin Walters  wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 04:14 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > may I request any feedback on this topic, and/or adding this topic to
> > the next Cloud WG meeting agenda ?
>
> It'd be nice to make Atomic Host a blocking deliverable - I think
> we have sufficient experience now and manpower to do that.

How this should work ? I am asking because Atomic is delivered
bi-weekly and Fedora releases are delivered two times a year. Perhaps
delivering the last released Atomic build before Fedora release GA
date might work. Any other/better ideas how this should be
synchronized ?

Regards,
Jan
> cloud mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Colin Walters]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 08:38 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> How this should work ? I am asking because Atomic

BTW let's try to consistently use the term "Atomic Host" for this.
> is delivered
> bi-weekly and Fedora releases are delivered two times a year. Perhaps
> delivering the last released Atomic build before Fedora release GA
> date might work. Any other/better ideas how this should be
> synchronized ?

The details of the synchronization are useful to look at,
but what concerns me more is ensuring that the base system (mostly
anaconda/systemd) works during the run-up to the next Fedora release.
(Which for F24 it didn't).

See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376811
for one active issue.

[Kushal Das]

On 16/09/16, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Colin Walters  wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, at 04:14 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > may I request any feedback on this topic, and/or adding this topic to
> > > the next Cloud WG meeting agenda ?
> >
> > It'd be nice to make Atomic Host a blocking deliverable - I think
> > we have sufficient experience now and manpower to do that.
>
> How this should work ? I am asking because Atomic is delivered
> bi-weekly and Fedora releases are delivered two times a year. Perhaps
> delivering the last released Atomic build before Fedora release GA
> date might work. Any other/better ideas how this should be
> synchronized ?

This is my understanding too. We sync up Atomic host with the latest
released Fedora GA, and then follow on our normal 2-week release cycle.
This does not make the 2 week atomic into the official 6month old
release cycle story.

Kushal

[Kushal Das]

On 07/09/16, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi Cloud/Atomic WG,
>
> I would like to request review of the WG deliverables for Fedora 25
> release. The list of deliverables is available on wiki:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/ReleaseBlocking/Fed...
> Please let me know, or edit the wiki page, in case there are missing
> deliverables or the current ones have wrong blocking status.
>
> There is going to be overall review done by FESCo, probably on
> 2016-Sep-30 for all the blocking deliverables.

I thought I already replied to this mail but seems like I am wrong :( As
I mentioned in the meeting last night, for F25 the current release
blocking list looks good for Cloud. Only the base image is blocking for
now.

Kushal