Hey guys,
A bunch of us (myself, Pingou, Ari, Dusty, Colin, and others) have been talking about the idea of delivering Atomic Host via a CI/CD pipeline.
The plan would be to provide continuous integration testing feedback to folks working on packages in Atomic Host and bringing together its compose.
In addition the composed QCow2, OSTree, and AMI artifacts that are integrated would be the same ones delivered to users, rather than being recomposed in a different way.
I've written something up that explains things further:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Continuous_Integration_and_Deliver...
I'd like to discuss this in the meeting today. Do we have time?
Cheers,
Stef
On 05.07.2017 15:02, Stef Walter wrote:
Hey guys,
A bunch of us (myself, Pingou, Ari, Dusty, Colin, and others) have been talking about the idea of delivering Atomic Host via a CI/CD pipeline.
The plan would be to provide continuous integration testing feedback to folks working on packages in Atomic Host and bringing together its compose.
In addition the composed QCow2, OSTree, and AMI artifacts that are integrated would be the same ones delivered to users, rather than being recomposed in a different way.
I've written something up that explains things further:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Continuous_Integration_and_Deliver...
I'd like to discuss this in the meeting today. Do we have time?
Perhaps next week would be better. This evening is a bit tight for me, and it'd be great to work through some things before the meeting, both on:
* Better explaining parts of the objective. * Changing the objective around to something workable.
Cheers,
Stef
On 07/05/2017 10:19 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 05.07.2017 15:02, Stef Walter wrote:
Hey guys,
A bunch of us (myself, Pingou, Ari, Dusty, Colin, and others) have been talking about the idea of delivering Atomic Host via a CI/CD pipeline.
The plan would be to provide continuous integration testing feedback to folks working on packages in Atomic Host and bringing together its compose.
In addition the composed QCow2, OSTree, and AMI artifacts that are integrated would be the same ones delivered to users, rather than being recomposed in a different way.
I've written something up that explains things further:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Continuous_Integration_and_Deliver...
I'd like to discuss this in the meeting today. Do we have time?
Perhaps next week would be better. This evening is a bit tight for me, and it'd be great to work through some things before the meeting, both on:
- Better explaining parts of the objective.
- Changing the objective around to something workable.
OK, I'll at least ask attendees to check out the linked document.
Dusty
On 07/05/2017 09:02 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
Hey guys,
A bunch of us (myself, Pingou, Ari, Dusty, Colin, and others) have been talking about the idea of delivering Atomic Host via a CI/CD pipeline.
The plan would be to provide continuous integration testing feedback to folks working on packages in Atomic Host and bringing together its compose.
In addition the composed QCow2, OSTree, and AMI artifacts that are integrated would be the same ones delivered to users, rather than being recomposed in a different way.
I've written something up that explains things further:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Continuous_Integration_and_Deliver...
I'd like to discuss this in the meeting today. Do we have time?
We should have time I don't think we have anything pressing to discuss other than normal tickets.
Dusty