On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:46:48PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 04/27/2012 06:21 PM, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>NameVirtualHost localhost?
We can use Virtual hosts to distinguish but that implies either
separate ports or DNS support. I'd like to stay away from multiple
ports due to the SELinux port assignments clashing with the ones the
OPenstack tends to use, but named virtual hosts will work fine.
Is HTTPS support for NamedVirtualHosts widespread enough these
days ? I know there have been issues with this in the past, and
even today it is much harder (and more expensive) to get x509
certs from real authorities for multi-hostnames / wildcards.
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|