On 2011-10-04 12:06, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
On Oct 4, 2011 12:59 PM, "Max Spevack" <mspevack@fedoraproject.org mailto:mspevack@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Hi folks,
I know that there was work afoot to release the F16 Beta AMi on the same day as the rest of F16 Beta.
Is that something that is good to go? And if it's not, what was the thing that blocked or held up the release of the Beta? The last AMI that I can see owned by aws@fedoraproject.org
mailto:aws@fedoraproject.org is
125523088429/Fedora-16-Beta-ec2-20110923-x86_64-sda -- I played around with that AMI and while I think there were a few cloud-init issues, it worked well enough to get the authorized_keys in the right place.
I'd also recommend that it become part of the schedule and workflow to update the get.fedoraproject.org http://get.fedoraproject.org page
with a link to the AMI IDs, as
well as the EC2 Images wiki page itself, with those AMI IDs. Not only for Alpha/Beta, but definitely for GA.
Maybe even add a blurb to the release announcement when it talks about the different ways to consume Fedora.
To me, those are the sorts of actions that begin to put Fedora on EC2 at a similar level to some of the other architectures, etc.
Good think Fedora's PM and RelEng are on this list :)
And the person who writes the release announcements, right? Heh.
I have no idea what the status is. Dennis mentioned the other day that the latest thing he had wasn't working (while we were in milan) - beyond that, without a ticket or etc. i have no idea.
But I do. :) cloud-init is currently doing things that make SElinux unhappy in such a way that one cannot log in. Dennis and I are working on the problem.