On 12/15/10 - 10:33:26PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
>>I guess this is incorrect. Because I'm very sure(&
rechecked) the
>>'repomod.xml' does exist in the url(mentioned in f14x86_64.tdl). And
>>using the very same url I do a lot of unattended network installs
>>via virt-install and kickstart.
>
>Hm, OK. It's a really good question, it should work. Questions:
>
>1) When you do the installs that succeed, do you use the virbr0 bridge, or do
>you have a real bridge that you typically use?
Yes, I do have a real bridge(br0) on my laptop.
That's my current bridge configuration.
-----------------------
kashyap@~$ brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.001f16114aca no eth0
virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
virbr1 8000.000000000000 yes
kashyap@~$
----------------------
But, I also tried it on a different machine wich has the default
virbr0( something like below) to no avail.
-------------------
[kashyap@foobar ~]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes
[kashyap@foobar ~]#
-------------------
Currently oz always uses the
>virbr0 bridge, and I'm wondering if there is some kind of firewall rule that
>is preventing it from getting out to the network.
I have my 'iptables' turned off. (In both instances above)
>2) What is your host system? Fedora 13? Fedora 14? Something else?
F14(newest updated); x86_64. Lenovo X200.
>
>I'll try to reproduce this locally and see what happens.
OK, it works fine for me locally. I can only guess that there is a rule or
something that is not properly setup for you. So let me get a bit information
from you:
1) brctl showstp virbr0
2) iptables -L ; iptables -t nat -L
3) cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
If it is indeed something to do with iptables (as I suspect), then the
following *might* help out:
$ sudo virsh net-destroy default
$ sudo virsh net-start default
Let me know if that helps, and if not, please give me the information from
above.
Thanks,
--
Chris Lalancette