On 03/13/2016 03:04 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kai Qiang Wu" wkqwu@cn.ibm.com To: "Steve Gordon" sgordon@redhat.com Cc: "Ton Ngo" ton@us.ibm.com Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:07:17 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting single/multiple OS distro
Hi Steveļ¼ I think what you did is rpm version, here is my finding:
[minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ rpm -qa | grep kubernetes kubernetes-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64 kubernetes-node-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64 kubernetes-client-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64 kubernetes-master-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64 [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ kubectl version Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6", GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"} Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6", GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
It seems we should trust kubectl version, it is final version, it said v1.0.6.
Adding cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org. Folks, can you explain the reason for the discrepancy between the packages that appear to have been used to build the image and the tools themselves? Specifically looking at Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
There is some history behind that. There is a bug report for it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860
The good news is that if you test out the kube 1.2 that is in updates testing and give it some karma we might be able to release close to the same time that kubernetes upstream releases 1.2:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a89f5ce5f4
- Dusty