On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 12:07 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote:
OK, to summarize:
a) There's a whole lot of pain and not much gain messing with
package file names (and file paths and scripts and ... ) b) The dependency Requires: cpu(cmov) (or equivalent token) might (*will* imho) be useful identifying packages that actually use, say, cmov. (Note: there's more than cmov that needs marking, generalizing the cpu(...) name space is quite straightforward.) c) Users want a clear call on what package file name to install, as some *.i386.rpm will not run on arch i386, very confusing. d) linuxthreads needs to die! die! die! (but that's just me ;-)
Name your poison (if any) please.
What's going to Provide: cpu(cmov)?