Would it be possible to add more information to the emails sent to notify about Koji Garbage Collection ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/GarbageCollection )? I receive these emails and I usually know why I received them (usually an update was obsoleted because of a fix for an issue that was identified in the testing repo), but sometimes I receive them and have no idea why. Was there a build I did but forgot about? Was it because of a rebuild that someone else did? Did I forgot to push an update to stable? Is this something I need to look into? It's usually possible to track down the "why" but annoying and time consuming to do so. So is the "why" available in the system that sends out the notification emails? If so, would it be possible for that to be included? Thanks, Dave
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:19:46 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohansen@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to add more information to the emails sent to notify about Koji Garbage Collection ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/GarbageCollection )?
I would think so yeah. ;)
Looks like these messages are hard coded into the koji-gc script, which is part of the koji-utils subpackage of koji.
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/koji/tree/util/koji-gc
I receive these emails and I usually know why I received them (usually an update was obsoleted because of a fix for an issue that was identified in the testing repo), but sometimes I receive them and have no idea why. Was there a build I did but forgot about? Was it because of a rebuild that someone else did? Did I forgot to push an update to stable? Is this something I need to look into? It's usually possible to track down the "why" but annoying and time consuming to do so. So is the "why" available in the system that sends out the notification emails? If so, would it be possible for that to be included? Thanks,
Not sure. The config we use is at:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/tree/roles/koji_hub...
I'm not sure it knows what rule matched or didn't match when it runs, but it might be possible to extend it.
kevin
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:19:46 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohansen@gmail.com wrote:
Would it be possible to add more information to the emails sent to notify about Koji Garbage Collection ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Koji/GarbageCollection )?
I would think so yeah. ;)
Looks like these messages are hard coded into the koji-gc script, which is part of the koji-utils subpackage of koji.
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/koji/tree/util/koji-gc
I receive these emails and I usually know why I received them (usually an update was obsoleted because of a fix for an issue that was identified in the testing repo), but sometimes I receive them and have no idea why. Was there a build I did but forgot about? Was it because of a rebuild that someone else did? Did I forgot to push an update to stable? Is this something I need to look into? It's usually possible to track down the "why" but annoying and time consuming to do so. So is the "why" available in the system that sends out the notification emails? If so, would it be possible for that to be included? Thanks,
Not sure. The config we use is at:
http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ansible.git/tree/roles/koji_hub...
I'm not sure it knows what rule matched or didn't match when it runs, but it might be possible to extend it.
Can I open a ticket requesting this feature enhancement? If so, is https://fedorahosted.org/koji/wiki the right place?
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:13:45 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohansen@gmail.com wrote:
Can I open a ticket requesting this feature enhancement? If so, is https://fedorahosted.org/koji/wiki the right place?
Sure.
kevin
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:13:45 -0700 Dave Johansen davejohansen@gmail.com wrote:
Can I open a ticket requesting this feature enhancement? If so, is https://fedorahosted.org/koji/wiki the right place?
Sure.
I created a ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/koji/ticket/322