Folks,
Am I missing something? I thought we weren't changing the C library itself for building static builds - my latest build can't find -lc:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1218885&name=build.log
Of course, it failed as I'm walking out the door so I'll probably see what it is later...but feel free to mail me with a suggestion.
Jon.
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:45:08PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
Am I missing something? I thought we weren't changing the C library itself for building static builds - my latest build can't find -lc:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1218885&name=build.log
Of course, it failed as I'm walking out the door so I'll probably see what it is later...but feel free to mail me with a suggestion.
Add BuildRequires: glibc-static if you need to link statically.
Jakub
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 01:48 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:45:08PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
Am I missing something? I thought we weren't changing the C library itself for building static builds - my latest build can't find -lc:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1218885&name=build.log
Of course, it failed as I'm walking out the door so I'll probably see what it is later...but feel free to mail me with a suggestion.
Add BuildRequires: glibc-static if you need to link statically.
This was my confusion...I thought you had said you weren't going to do that? I'm happy to do so and I will right now, but it seems the opposite of what had been previously stated, and it's changed since the mass rebuild rebuilt the package only the other day.
Jon.
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:41:43AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 01:48 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:45:08PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
Am I missing something? I thought we weren't changing the C library itself for building static builds - my latest build can't find -lc:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1218885&name=build.log
Of course, it failed as I'm walking out the door so I'll probably see what it is later...but feel free to mail me with a suggestion.
Add BuildRequires: glibc-static if you need to link statically.
This was my confusion...I thought you had said you weren't going to do that? I'm happy to do so and I will right now, but it seems the opposite
Yeah, I initially didn't want to do that, then changed my mind.
of what had been previously stated, and it's changed since the mass rebuild rebuilt the package only the other day.
No. This change was done on February, 18th, before the mass rebuild.
Jakub
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 09:23 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:41:43AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
of what had been previously stated, and it's changed since the mass rebuild rebuilt the package only the other day.
No. This change was done on February, 18th, before the mass rebuild.
Ok, I didn't look into it, but anyway, it's fine now. Thanks.
Jon.