From manisandro at gmail.com Tue Aug 15 21:57:14 2023 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4634521975068759021==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sandro Mani To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 23:56:56 +0200 Message-ID: --===============4634521975068759021== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of = test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign = currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've = prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The = review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/podofo-0.10.1/builds/ [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2232243 --===============4634521975068759021==-- From j at tib.bs Wed Aug 16 03:58:12 2023 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3883217816329872068==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jason Tibbitts To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:57:53 -0500 Message-ID: <875y5foczi.fsf@tib.bs> In-Reply-To: cdd09a67-39ca-3ae6-4597-c0012b7e7d7c@gmail.com --===============3883217816329872068== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Sandro Mani writes: > To keep these functional, I've prepared a podofo-compat package with > the previous 0.9.x library. The review request is here [2]. Happy to > review in exchange. Note that it's not necessary to go through the review process for multiple versions of packages like this, providing they are named correctly according to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple We don't use "compat" in the name but instead just something like podofo0.9. To import a package like that, you just do fedpkg request-repo with the "--exception" flag. One of the SCM admins will need to approve it but I try to do that relatively often. - J< --===============3883217816329872068==-- From jani at sinervo.fi Wed Aug 16 04:39:32 2023 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============9179447955787681446==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: jani To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 07:38:54 +0300 Message-ID: <20230816043918.7FB914467623F@mailman01.iad2.fedoraproject.org> In-Reply-To: 875y5foczi.fsf@tib.bs --===============9179447955787681446== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=F0=9F=98=83

Sent from my Samsung= Galaxy Watch

---= ----- Original message --------

From: Jason Tibbitts <j(a)tib.= bs>

Date: 16/08/2023 06:58 (GMT+02:00)

To: Sandr= o Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com>

Cc: Development discussion= s related to Fedora <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>

Subj= ect: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

null null --===============9179447955787681446== Content-Type: text/html MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="attachment.html" PGh0bWw+PGhlYWQ+PG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0 L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9VVRGLTgiPjwvaGVhZD48Ym9keSA+PGRpdj7wn5iDPC9kaXY+PGJyPjxi cj5TZW50IGZyb20gbXkgU2Ftc3VuZyBHYWxheHkgV2F0Y2g8ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxi cj48L2Rpdj48IS0tIG9yaWdpbmFsTWVzc2FnZSAtLT48ZGl2Pi0tLS0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFsIG1l c3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0tLS08L2Rpdj48ZGl2PkZyb206IEphc29uIFRpYmJpdHRzICZsdDtqQHRpYi5i cyZndDsgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj5EYXRlOiAxNi8wOC8yMDIzICAwNjo1OCAgKEdNVCswMjowMCkgPC9k aXY+PGRpdj5UbzogU2FuZHJvIE1hbmkgJmx0O21hbmlzYW5kcm9AZ21haWwuY29tJmd0OyA8L2Rp dj48ZGl2PkNjOiBEZXZlbG9wbWVudCBkaXNjdXNzaW9ucyByZWxhdGVkIHRvIEZlZG9yYSAmbHQ7 ZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZmVkb3JhcHJvamVjdC5vcmcmZ3Q7IDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+U3ViamVjdDogUmU6 IFBsYW5uaW5nIHRvIHVwZGF0ZSB0byBwb2RvZm8tMC4xMC4xICsgcmV2aWV3IHJlcXVlc3QgZm9y DSAgcG9kb2ZvLWNvbXBhdCBmb3IgbGVnYWN5IDAuOS54IGxpYnJhcnkgPC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+ PC9kaXY+ --===============9179447955787681446==-- From manisandro at gmail.com Wed Aug 16 19:02:20 2023 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6895745138175501967==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sandro Mani To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 21:00:34 +0200 Message-ID: <3cb94ec7-4f52-2a8b-b1bc-606cb9e5559a@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: cdd09a67-39ca-3ae6-4597-c0012b7e7d7c@gmail.com --===============6895745138175501967== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is now done. Sandro On 15.08.23 23:56, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of = > test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign = > currently do not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've = > prepared a podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The = > review request is here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. > > Thanks > Sandro > > [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/podofo-0.10.1/builds/ > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2232243 > --===============6895745138175501967==-- From kevin at scrye.com Wed Aug 16 19:33:58 2023 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3177728796277618805==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Fenzi To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:33:05 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: 3cb94ec7-4f52-2a8b-b1bc-606cb9e5559a@gmail.com --===============3177728796277618805== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:00:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > This is now done. Thanks for doing this! kevin --===============3177728796277618805== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KCmlRSXpCQUFCQ2dBZEZpRUVTejdycHJCSkhw Ym5NbnJRU3pldzJBLzd1MTRGQW1UZEpHOEFDZ2tRU3pldzJBLzcKdTE2eDJSQUFuVVFBZVZrWnFo bE9la3owOUFncHRBcDlBRmRVUmRqMmtYc1NhTUdUekRwNnM2YWdHWSt1dzVXVQpyN3htSGNTUzZO ajdNU0VXZ3A5NGFtMTVIQkJCaUFudjBhQjJwbE5IOXd6eUFwc3F3U24yQURKcnF2L0VveHozClNK MFhZbVFKZ0hNdTQxQnVVVE55UDhKWkQ3Uk1USFFnZThYalRHdmxpMEwxOExITzVQRGZGbHVheGYw dEMxQnYKek0vTmxBUVFFSTh5VkJZOEs0amt6ODhBeTdQMjdaUjRDQ3M2NGVRdmdISVBHR1JIVURi RFR2Q252QW5KYnRFTgp3OG16UTFHejViQWhuNTVnOGxlWGQyN0dCbU0vVndpNjRheXdrbk1ya2xK TGVkSERQY0ltY0wxUWhYRjFWRlJaCkF1bXNMNEdWOWpocnp1ejJSUjh2OE5IZXhxTFFKK0kwWDJX akpNR0N1Q21GZjFzTGtmak1BV1ZmSGpjN1dzWjQKZFhUSE1BN044VTlFd01iS09ZTEkvS0R1QW1x MjY1RlhSQy96OFgzd1BTeStLU29LemVTSG9zcTgrT0hCanpvaAp2NEM0cGNab1pGYXo3QjZ1STZH OHRJYURVb2hCd0E0a2RYQVp0ZU1ZSHZMenQzR3NYb0dLNGZLYmN3STJNS3J1CmVnWVUxVGQzclNB U1ZaVW14T3A3eGg3UlNwSEpraVFCekVWU1AralZreXBkcW5NK3lodUpiVERBTkd3bGQ1WTAKUWVB VW52RHZRSlJ5cXpFeTNYM1A3ODNMODlCayt1TTA5WVdNZ3pBTkFGK0NyWktMa3JOaER1eis4eitW ZTVIUgpSVVhMakIvdWJYQWpZNUVnT1c0SVVrNlpkMWJ1Yys2TFA0QVJoc0V6U0o0WnoyWVBJUzg9 Cj1wc21jCi0tLS0tRU5EIFBHUCBTSUdOQVRVUkUtLS0tLQo= --===============3177728796277618805==-- From zbyszek at in.waw.pl Sun Dec 17 16:44:55 2023 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4168314667431082747==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?utf-8?q?Zbigniew_J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek_=3Czbyszek_at_in=2Ewaw=2Epl=3E?= To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 16:44:36 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: cdd09a67-39ca-3ae6-4597-c0012b7e7d7c@gmail.com --===============4168314667431082747== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > = > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently= do > not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a > podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review request= is > here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. Hi, we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide with podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-compa= t-0.9.x also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequires = line. Zbyszek --===============4168314667431082747==-- From manisandro at gmail.com Mon Dec 18 15:38:02 2023 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8635650591442671380==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sandro Mani To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:37:44 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ZX8ldGlGEjz118US@kawka3.in.waw.pl --===============8635650591442671380== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17.12.23 17:44, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: >> Hi >> >> I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of te= st >> builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currentl= y do >> not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a >> podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review reques= t is >> here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. > Hi, > > we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide wi= th > podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just > built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update > for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-com= pat-0.9.x > also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that > need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequire= s line. Hi I've done so: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-e8f9188f10 Sandro --===============8635650591442671380==-- From zbyszek at in.waw.pl Fri Jan 5 16:57:48 2024 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6056138012327200726==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?utf-8?q?Zbigniew_J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek_=3Czbyszek_at_in=2Ewaw=2Epl=3E?= To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 16:57:01 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ZX8ldGlGEjz118US@kawka3.in.waw.pl --===============6056138012327200726== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek = wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi > > = > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of t= est > > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign current= ly do > > not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a > > podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review reque= st is > > here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. > = > Hi, > = > we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide wi= th > podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just > built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update > for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-com= pat-0.9.x > also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that > need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequire= s line. Bump in the new year. PTAL. Zbyszek --===============6056138012327200726==-- From manisandro at gmail.com Fri Jan 5 17:14:18 2024 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1979173356841105278==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sandro Mani To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 18:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ZZg03TUjYwgfPLQo@kawka3.in.waw.pl --===============1979173356841105278== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Szme= k wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of t= est >>> builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign current= ly do >>> not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a >>> podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review reque= st is >>> here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. >> Hi, >> >> we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhide w= ith >> podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just >> built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update >> for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo-co= mpat-0.9.x >> also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages that >> need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildRequir= es line. > Bump in the new year. PTAL. Hi Zbyszek I already took care of this: = https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=3D2334737 Sandro --===============1979173356841105278== Content-Type: text/html MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="attachment.html" PCFET0NUWVBFIGh0bWw+CjxodG1sPgogIDxoZWFkPgogICAgPG1ldGEgaHR0cC1lcXVpdj0iQ29u dGVudC1UeXBlIiBjb250ZW50PSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJzZXQ9VVRGLTgiPgogIDwvaGVhZD4K ICA8Ym9keT4KICAgIDxwPjxicj4KICAgIDwvcD4KICAgIDxkaXYgY2xhc3M9Im1vei1jaXRlLXBy ZWZpeCI+T24gMDUuMDEuMjQgMTc6NTcsIFpiaWduaWV3CiAgICAgIErEmWRyemVqZXdza2ktU3pt ZWsgd3JvdGU6PGJyPgogICAgPC9kaXY+CiAgICA8YmxvY2txdW90ZSB0eXBlPSJjaXRlIiBjaXRl PSJtaWQ6WlpnMDNUVWpZd2dmUExRb0BrYXdrYTMuaW4ud2F3LnBsIj4KICAgICAgPHByZSBjbGFz cz0ibW96LXF1b3RlLXByZSIgd3JhcD0iIj5PbiBTdW4sIERlYyAxNywgMjAyMyBhdCAwNDo0NDoz NlBNICswMDAwLCBaYmlnbmlldyBKxJlkcnplamV3c2tpLVN6bWVrIHdyb3RlOgo8L3ByZT4KICAg ICAgPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgdHlwZT0iY2l0ZSI+CiAgICAgICAgPHByZSBjbGFzcz0ibW96LXF1b3Rl LXByZSIgd3JhcD0iIj5PbiBUdWUsIEF1ZyAxNSwgMjAyMyBhdCAxMTo1Njo1NlBNICswMjAwLCBT YW5kcm8gTWFuaSB3cm90ZToKPC9wcmU+CiAgICAgICAgPGJsb2NrcXVvdGUgdHlwZT0iY2l0ZSI+ CiAgICAgICAgICA8cHJlIGNsYXNzPSJtb3otcXVvdGUtcHJlIiB3cmFwPSIiPkhpCgpJJ20gcGxh bm5pbmcgdG8gdXBkYXRlIHRvIHBvZG9mby0wLjEwLjEgaW4gcmF3aGlkZS4gSSBkaWQgYSBzZXJp ZXMgb2YgdGVzdApidWlsZHMgaGVyZSBbMV0sIGFjY29yZGluZyB0byB3aGljaCBzY3JpYnVzLCB2 ZnJuYXYgYW5kIHBkZnNpZ24gY3VycmVudGx5IGRvCm5vdCBzdXBwb3J0IHBvZG9mby0wLjEwLngu IFRvIGtlZXAgdGhlc2UgZnVuY3Rpb25hbCwgSSd2ZSBwcmVwYXJlZCBhCnBvZG9mby1jb21wYXQg cGFja2FnZSB3aXRoIHRoZSBwcmV2aW91cyAwLjkueCBsaWJyYXJ5LiBUaGUgcmV2aWV3IHJlcXVl c3QgaXMKaGVyZSBbMl0uIEhhcHB5IHRvIHJldmlldyBpbiBleGNoYW5nZS4KPC9wcmU+CiAgICAg ICAgPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPgogICAgICAgIDxwcmUgY2xhc3M9Im1vei1xdW90ZS1wcmUiIHdyYXA9 IiI+CkhpLAoKd2UgaGF2ZSB0aGUgb3Bwb3NpdGUgc2l0dWF0aW9uIHdpdGggY2FsaWJyZTogaXQg YnVpbGRzIGZpbmUgaW4gcmF3aGlkZSB3aXRoCnBvZG9mby0wLjEwLCBidXQgZG9lcyBub3QgY29t cGlsZSBhZ2FpbnN0IHBvZG9mby0wLjkuOCBpbiBGMzkuIEkganVzdApidWlsdCBjYWxpYnJlLTcu Mi4wIGluIHJhd2hpZGUsIGFuZCB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGRvIHRoZSBzYW1lIHVwZGF0ZQpmb3Ig RjM5LiBJcyB0aGVyZSBhbnkgY2hhbmNlIHlvdSBjYW4gYWxzbyBwdXNoIHBvZG9mby0wLjEwLngg KyBwb2RvZm8tY29tcGF0LTAuOS54CmFsc28gdG8gRjM5PyBJIHRoaW5rIHRoYXQnZCBiZSBPSywg YmVjYXVzZSB3ZSBjYW4ga2VlcCB0aGUgcGFja2FnZXMgdGhhdApuZWVkIHRoZSBvbGQgdmVyc2lv biBidWlsZGluZywgcG9zc2libHkgYWZ0ZXIgYWRqdXN0aW5nIHNvbWUgQnVpbGRSZXF1aXJlcyBs aW5lLgo8L3ByZT4KICAgICAgPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPgogICAgICA8cHJlIGNsYXNzPSJtb3otcXVv dGUtcHJlIiB3cmFwPSIiPgpCdW1wIGluIHRoZSBuZXcgeWVhci4gUFRBTC48L3ByZT4KICAgIDwv YmxvY2txdW90ZT4KICAgIDxwPkhpIDxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJ3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTogcHJlLXdyYXAi PlpieXN6ZWs8L3NwYW4+PC9wPgogICAgPHA+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9IndoaXRlLXNwYWNlOiBwcmUt d3JhcCI+SSBhbHJlYWR5IHRvb2sgY2FyZSBvZiB0aGlzOiA8YSBjbGFzcz0ibW96LXR4dC1saW5r LWZyZWV0ZXh0IiBocmVmPSJodHRwczovL2tvamkuZmVkb3JhcHJvamVjdC5vcmcva29qaS9idWls ZGluZm8/YnVpbGRJRD0yMzM0NzM3Ij5odHRwczovL2tvamkuZmVkb3JhcHJvamVjdC5vcmcva29q aS9idWlsZGluZm8/YnVpbGRJRD0yMzM0NzM3PC9hPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+CiAgICA8cD48c3BhbiBz dHlsZT0id2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6IHByZS13cmFwIj5TYW5kcm88L3NwYW4+PC9wPgogIDwvYm9keT4K PC9odG1sPgo= --===============1979173356841105278==-- From zbyszek at in.waw.pl Fri Jan 5 17:18:17 2024 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0556410701020757479==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?utf-8?q?Zbigniew_J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek_=3Czbyszek_at_in=2Ewaw=2Epl=3E?= To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 17:17:32 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: d3e6a0ff-7a22-4dd8-a971-74426abe21d2@gmail.com --===============0556410701020757479== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > = > On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Sz= mek wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > = > > > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series = of test > > > > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign cur= rently do > > > > not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepared a > > > > podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review r= equest is > > > > here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. > > > Hi, > > > = > > > we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawhid= e with > > > podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I just > > > built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update > > > for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podofo= -compat-0.9.x > > > also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages t= hat > > > need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildReq= uires line. > > Bump in the new year. PTAL. > = > Hi Zbyszek > = > I already took care of this: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=3D2334737 Oh, I missed that. Thanks! Zbyszek --===============0556410701020757479==-- From zbyszek at in.waw.pl Sat Jan 6 17:45:30 2024 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8779226721389646265==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: =?utf-8?q?Zbigniew_J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek_=3Czbyszek_at_in=2Ewaw=2Epl=3E?= To: devel at lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2024 17:44:41 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: ZZg5rJmcv2vG2JSr@kawka3.in.waw.pl --===============8779226721389646265== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:17:32PM +0000, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek = wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > = > > On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +0000, Zbigniew J=C4=99drzejewski-= Szmek wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > Hi > > > > > = > > > > > I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a serie= s of test > > > > > builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign c= urrently do > > > > > not support podofo-0.10.x. To keep these functional, I've prepare= d a > > > > > podofo-compat package with the previous 0.9.x library. The review= request is > > > > > here [2]. Happy to review in exchange. > > > > Hi, > > > > = > > > > we have the opposite situation with calibre: it builds fine in rawh= ide with > > > > podofo-0.10, but does not compile against podofo-0.9.8 in F39. I ju= st > > > > built calibre-7.2.0 in rawhide, and would like to do the same update > > > > for F39. Is there any chance you can also push podofo-0.10.x + podo= fo-compat-0.9.x > > > > also to F39? I think that'd be OK, because we can keep the packages= that > > > > need the old version building, possibly after adjusting some BuildR= equires line. > > > Bump in the new year. PTAL. > > = > > Hi Zbyszek > > = > > I already took care of this: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=3D2334737 > = > Oh, I missed that. Thanks! I submitted calibre-7.3.0-1.fc39 now. Zbyszek --===============8779226721389646265==--