On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:06:38PM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
There isn't but there should be. Rahul started to put together a policy for that that would have modified the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy. It was not approved by FESCo but I don't remember what the sticking points were.
I only remember vaguely, one thing that was said was that one had to wait for the packager containment of Jesse to be in place. Though I think it is a progress to have packagers and provenpackagers, I don't think it will help here.
I'll go reread some mails.
-- Pat