Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:51:15PM -0600, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> -jef"why does fvwm need an mta?"spaleta
> ...I was wondering that also ;-).
It is for fvwm-bug. Guess that it calls sendmail.
Ah :-). That makes sense.
--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
"...anyway, that's my 0.02 toasters"
(with apologies to Niel)