As I found this discussion interesting and I believe FESCo is the right authority to help with this, I have opened a ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1495 for the FESCo meeting on Wednesday, to discuss it.
Regards, Jan
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.11.2015 um 02:28 schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Dom, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto sergio@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD. GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03.
Today we got 531 updates for F23 , IMO, you should include it on Fedora
23 Final before GA , doesn't make sense (to me) after download an ISO have 1/2 Giga of updates, but this happens since RedHad 9 at least . IMO, testing team should respin ISO with updates and testing again . I have some difficulty in following all development, fortunately Fedora is always at great speed, but it is not easy to follow. And do more tests we not lose anything, IMHO.
The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If not it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything works as expected. To freeze is a fairly standard procedure for all distro development.
Make an respin for F23 with stable updates, IMHO, should not break anything, because at this stage, just stable things are being pushed
in theory
it should be just one more loop in testing phase, anyway if breaks
something test team can freeze process again, until provide a fix.
who does the work for *what* benefit? it's just wasting ressources and manpower
who cares about the install ISO when you ave anyways to apply updates after or in the best case *due* setup
This is not new !, respins of fedoraunity was an example and we already
have living respins [1], so we just need do new respin officially!. Shouldn't be a big deal, If I'm not mistaken.
and fedoraunity finally gave up because lack of ressources
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct