2009/1/3 Thomas Moschny thomas.moschny@gmail.com:
2009/1/2 Brian Pepple bpepple@fedoraproject.org:
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:36 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Twenty reviews of small packages, which are trivial to review (or even flawless to begin with because the packager is experienced!), or reviews of package rename requests, may be less of an achievement than one review of a big beast with dependencies, which has been waiting in the review queue for many months and needed lots of work.
Totally agree with you, but I don't think we have any way currently to differentiate the difficulty between reviews that we could extract into a report.
The number of comments the reviewer himself added to the review ticket could give a hint on how to complicated the review was.
Sometime reviewer does not take a note of what he has tested [assuming reporter has already done clever job] unless package fails that test. So, number of comments are also not a good hint.