orphaning gwibber, any takers?

[Ian Weller]

I know Gwibber is widely used by Fedora users because there are a
crapton of abrt reports for it and I just can't keep up with it. :)

Let me know if you have a desire for maintaining Gwibber in Fedora. From
what I've heard, a release of 2.30 is on the horizon [1], and I just
don't have the time to reproduce bugs :)

[1]: http://identi.ca/notice/18051236

-- 
Ian Weller <ian(a)ianweller.org&gt;
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

[Tom Callaway]

On 01/04/2010 04:25 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
>  I know Gwibber is widely used by Fedora users because there are a
>  crapton of abrt reports for it and I just can't keep up with it. :)
>  
>  Let me know if you have a desire for maintaining Gwibber in Fedora. From
>  what I've heard, a release of 2.30 is on the horizon [1], and I just
>  don't have the time to reproduce bugs :)
>  
>  [1]: http://identi.ca/notice/18051236 
If no one else wants it, I will take it. I'd prefer to comaintain it
with someone who has more time than I do. :)

~spot

[Alex Hudson]

On 04/01/10 21:47, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>  On 01/04/2010 04:25 PM, Ian Weller wrote:
>     
> > I know Gwibber is widely used by Fedora users because there are a
> > crapton of abrt reports for it and I just can't keep up with it. :)
> >
> >      
>  If no one else wants it, I will take it. I'd prefer to comaintain it
>  with someone who has more time than I do. :)
>      
I'd happily co-maintain - I use gwibber a fair amount and can probably 
have a stab at debugging some of the issues.

Cheers

Alex.