docs-qa February 2013

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
35 discussions

[Bug 822857] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822857 Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: unspecified Component: readme-burning-isos AssignedTo: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'. And then delete the fr_FR one. fr_FR is not the only duplicated team. See #816765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 822855] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822855 Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: unspecified Component: virtualization-guide AssignedTo: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'. And then delete the fr_FR one. fr_FR is not the only duplicated team. See #816765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 822859] New: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822859 Summary: please merge 'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr' Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: urgent Priority: unspecified Component: accessibility-guide AssignedTo: mail.gerardryan(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: kev.raymond(a)gmail.com QAContact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: eric(a)christensenplace.us, oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: Bug Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Once again, please merge the'fr_FR' transifex team under 'fr'. And then delete the fr_FR one. fr_FR is not the only duplicated team. See #816765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 912563] New: Instructions faulty and/or lackng regarding validation of ISO's from a Windows 7 platform
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Mar '13

07 Mar '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912563 Bug ID: 912563 Summary: Instructions faulty and/or lackng regarding validation of ISO's from a Windows 7 platform Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Reporter: j.moorhouse(a)zoomtown.com Created attachment 699286 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=699286&action=edit Attachment 3 (the other 2 weren't allowed); 3 attempts at Command Prompt Description of problem: First, you assume that the CHECKSUM file is readily available; it isn't. It can be found by clicking the proper link from https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify . In "Burning ISO Images to disc" 3.1 you suggest 3 free tools to check the hashes in a Windows Graphical Environment; none work. HashTab (att 1) doesn't cover the SHA256 algorithm, the web site for the Marxio File Checksum Verifier couldn't be accessed, snd the DiviHasher (att 2) worked fine except that the length of the calculated hash exceeded the space available. In 3.2 (att 3), we are trying the Command Line. The first attempt does it just like the manual; it failed. The second assumed that by "Owner" in the manual example you meant to substitute the actual name of the owner; it too failed. The third attempt does the directory change in one operation and the hash calculation in another, because that works; doing them both in the same contiguous operation doesn't. Incidentally, Windows no longer uses those cuddly little "My Whatever" expressions. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Very!! I spent over a week fighting this! Steps to Reproduce: 1. Just follow the printed directions exactly 2. 3. Actual results: See attachments Expected results: Calculation of a valid checksum Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 879745] New: 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual Host causes systax errors
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879745 Bug ID: 879745 Summary: 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual Host causes systax errors Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: freeipa-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: deanhunter(a)comcast.net Description of problem: Following the instructions in Section 18.5. Setting a FreeIPA Server as an Apache Virtual Host of the FreeIPA Guide results in systax errors in the Apache configuration. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 17 FreeIPA Guide freeipa-server.x86_64 2.2.1-2.fc17 How reproducible: consistently Steps to Reproduce: 1. Follow the instructions to modify ipa.conf 2. apachectl configtest Actual results: WSGISocketPrefix cannot occur within <VirtualHost> section KrbConstrainedDelegationLock cannot occur within <VirtualHost> section Expected results: Syntax OK Additional info: I am trying to server user content from the Apache server installed with FreeIPA. I thought if I configured the IPA server into a virtual host I could create additional virtual hosts for user content without conflict. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 848546] New: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848546 Bug ID: 848546 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified Assignee: dlackey(a)redhat.com Summary: ipa-install-server used instead of ipa-server-install Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: rmeggins(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: freeipa-guide Product: Fedora Documentation https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/17/html/FreeIPA_Guide/creating-… "The FreeIPA setup process can be minimal, where the administrator only supplies some required information, or it can be very specific, with user-defined settings for many parts of the FreeIPA services. The configuration is passed using arguments with the ipa-install-server script." This should say ipa-server-install -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 746862] Cleaning up the grammar in Introduction
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746862 Navneet Singh <navneetsingh0693(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QA Contact|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject | |.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 907627] New: Some suggested grammatical corrections
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Feb '13

28 Feb '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907627 Bug ID: 907627 Summary: Some suggested grammatical corrections Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Reporter: dram1964(a)gmail.com Just read the draft version 18.2.2 and would like to offer the following corrections for consideration: Preface: Section 1.1 Replace: Key combinations can be distinguished from keycaps by the hyphen connecting each part With: Key combinations can be distinguished from keycaps by the plus sign (+) connecting each part Chapter 1: Perhaps an explanation of what UEFI stands for would be useful in the introduction? Chapter 1: Section 1.1 Replace: We can be certain that no unsigned executable code is present until the initial ramdisk (initrd) is loaded With: Secure Boot ensures that no unsigned executable code is present until the initial ramdisk (initrd) is loaded Chapter 1: Section 1.2 Replace: In Fedora if you use Secure Boot, what modules the kernel loads can be restricted, but user space malware cannot. With: Secure Boot in Fedora allows you to restrict modules loaded by the kernel: but it does not allow you to control malware loaded in user space. Chapter 2: Section 2.1 Replace: The solution to use the Microsoft signing service was one of simplicity With: The option to use the Microsoft signing service was provided for simplicity Chapter 2: Section 2.2 Typo: Thie blacklist is a file Correction: The blacklist is a file Replace: Microsoft will provide this list to Fedora Project With: Microsoft will provide this list to the Fedora Project Replace: Microsoft has stated that the blacklist is to be used to prevent binaries being used for attacks from executing. With: Microsoft has stated that the blacklist is to be used to prevent binaries being used to execute attacks. Replace: We are working to limit the impacts of this With: We are working to limit the impact of this Chapter 2: Section 2.3 Replace: In future iterations of Secure Boot support the above may also be possible With: In future iterations of Secure Boot support for the above may also be possible regards Dave R -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 910745] New: pesign does not include sbsetup
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Feb '13

13 Feb '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=910745 Bug ID: 910745 Summary: pesign does not include sbsetup Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: uefi-secure-boot-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com The tool mention in the section on pesign is not part of the Fedora package. We need to find out if we ship comparable code somewhere else and document how to use that to enable UEFI Secure Boot (including Microsoft's mode of operation). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 830870] still references to F12 and F13
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Feb '13

10 Feb '13

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830870 Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dew(a)donaldwinslow.info --- Comment #2 from Pete Travis <me(a)petetravis.com> --- *** Bug 881562 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa February 2013