June 2015 - docs-qa - Fedora mailing-lists

[Bug 982911] New: 7.3.3. Establishing a Mobile Broadband Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982911 Bug ID: 982911 Summary: 7.3.3. Establishing a Mobile Broadband Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Under section 7.3.3, in 'Procedure 7.3. Adding a New Mobile Broadband Connection', 'Procedure 7.4. Editing an Existing Mobile Broadband Connection': network connection editor can also be found at: activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 982910] New: 7.3.5. Establishing a DSL Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jun '16

07 Jun '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982910 Bug ID: 982910 Summary: 7.3.5. Establishing a DSL Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 7.3.5 under 'Procedure 7.6. Adding a New DSL Connection', 'Procedure 7.7. Editing an Existing DSL Connection': These procedures could also specify that the network connections editor can be accessed from: activities --> applications --> Sundry --> Network Connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1221780] New: how to identify firmware types, UEFI vs BIOS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 May '16

19 May '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221780 Bug ID: 1221780 Summary: how to identify firmware types, UEFI vs BIOS Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: bugzilla(a)colorremedies.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com I'm not finding advice in documentation to identify firmware type. Should we, and if so where should it go? Identifying firmware type comes in handy e.g. reinstalling grub, see bug 1220066. The problem is, users overwhelmingly equate UEFI and BIOS, often referring to it as UEFI BIOS, mainly because OEM's still call firmware updates "BIOS updates". Two possible ways to reliably identify UEFI vs BIOS firmware. On an EFI system: # ls /sys/firmware/efi config_table efivars fw_platform_size fw_vendor runtime runtime-map systab vars On a BIOS system: # ls /sys/firmware/efi ls: cannot access /sys/firmware/efi: No such file or directory ---- On an EFI system: # efibootmgr BootCurrent: 0000 Timeout: 5 seconds BootOrder: 0000,0080 Boot0000* Fedora Boot0080* Mac OS X Boot0082* BootD1A6* AST BootFFFF* On a BIOS system: # efibootmgr efibootmgr: EFI variables are not supported on this system. Unknowns: The first method always works since ls is for sure installed no matter what. I need to test if efibootmgr is always installed, e.g. netinstall (?), it definitely is always installed from lives. But if it's not installed, then it's not a UEFI system. How does coreboot firmware manifest? I think it's mainly a "better BIOS" and should behave as such. ARM firmware? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1003065] New: images missing from document
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003065 Bug ID: 1003065 Summary: images missing from document Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: low Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: mordred(a)warpmail.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: in document: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administra… missing following 5 images under: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html-single/System_Administra… images/authconfig-ui.png images/authconfig-local.png images/authconfig_LDAP.png images/authconfig_nis.png images/authconfig_winbind.png Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): n/a How reproducible: n/a Steps to Reproduce: n/a Actual results: Expected results: n/a Additional info: n/a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987309] New: Section 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 screenshot requires updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987309 Bug ID: 987309 Summary: Section 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 screenshot requires updating Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777226 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777226&action=edit advanced options F19 Description of problem: Screenshot in 11.1.3 Figure 11.3 needs updating -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 987307] New: Section 11.1.2.4 Figure 11.2 requires updating
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987307 Bug ID: 987307 Summary: Section 11.1.2.4 Figure 11.2 requires updating Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Created attachment 777222 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=777222&action=edit layout of ldap/kerberos options in authentication dialog Description of problem: Figure 11.2 in section 11.1.2.4 no longer looks like this as there is a third 'password options tab' on this dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 987301] New: Section 11.1.1 Figure 11.1 missing
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987301 Bug ID: 987301 Summary: Section 11.1.1 Figure 11.1 missing Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 11.1.1 has a missing screenshot (Figure 11.1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 983366] New: Cover Page says "Fedora 17" in 'header' logo
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983366 Bug ID: 983366 Summary: Cover Page says "Fedora 17" in 'header' logo Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Header logo on cover page of System Administrators guide says "Fedora 17" above first line of text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982894] New: 7.2.4. User and System Connections
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982894 Bug ID: 982894 Summary: 7.2.4. User and System Connections Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: the network settings dialogue does not have tabs, instead, the identity section of the dialogue is concerned with setting the connection to be available to all users (or not) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982510] New: 4.3. Using the User Manager Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982510 Bug ID: 982510 Summary: 4.3. Using the User Manager Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: In section 4.3, the location of the user manager tool has changed in Gnome 3.8.3: Activities --> Applications --> Sundry --> Users and Groups -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982504] New: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982504 Bug ID: 982504 Summary: 4.2. Using the User Accounts Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: section 4.2 Using the User Accounts Tool related to bug 982500 location of the settings dialog is: activities --> applications --> utilities --> settings Further: The 'User Accounts' tool is called 'Users' in Gnome 3.8.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 982444] New: 1.1 - region and language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982444 Bug ID: 982444 Summary: 1.1 - region and language Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Sys admin guide information regarding region and language doesn't specify which desktop environment is assumed to find the region and language. Also to find region and language in KDE, you click on the applications launcher, go to applications --> settings --> system settings, but it's also set as a favourite by default in F19 so can be found under favourites. Also in KDE, under system settings, the 'region and language' settings are under 'locale', 'country/region and language'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 982500] New: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Apr '16

12 Apr '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982500 Bug ID: 982500 Summary: 2.1 Using the Date and Time Configuration Tool Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Gnome settings menu location has changed in 3.8.3: Activities --> Applications --> Utilities --> Settings This is not reflected in section 2.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1136030] New: Need a new chapter about upgrading Fedora
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '16

06 Mar '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136030 Bug ID: 1136030 Summary: Need a new chapter about upgrading Fedora Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pbokoc(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The current upgrade chapter is pretty much completely useless. We need a new one that would cover: * Automatic upgrades with FedUp, including how to prepare and how to clean up after the update finishes * Manual upgrade (or reinstall) - manually booting the installer on an existing system and using the normal installation process to overwrite the root filesystem while keeping the rest of the system (/home and any other separate filesystems) intact. There should be ample documentation on FedUp on the Fedora Wiki. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1018500] New: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after Fedora 14
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Mar '16

06 Mar '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018500 Bug ID: 1018500 Summary: There's no section in the documentation for NFS, after Fedora 14 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: storage-administration-guide Assignee: ddomingo(a)redhat.com Reporter: david.jones74(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: ddomingo(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: There's no section in the documentation for current Fedora versions, about how to configure NFS. There's SAMBA and FTP, but no NFS. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Search or browse documentation. 2. 3. Actual results: Can find scattered information about configuring NFS, but no consolidated section. Expected results: Section for configuring NFS clients and servers. Additional info: There are many changes in NFS configuration since Fedora 14. There's a different init system with different service names, There's also a new firewall manager. I'm just guess at a lot of the details, and it's pretty frustrating. Why does SAMBA have a large detailed section, and NFS has nothing? This is Linux, right? Is the Fedora Project moving to SAMBA as the preferred file sharing method? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1226101] New: $expected_checksum not correct in "Verifying checksums on Windows systems"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Feb '16

02 Feb '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226101 Bug ID: 1226101 Summary: $expected_checksum not correct in "Verifying checksums on Windows systems" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: iam(a)nnutter.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Created attachment 1031533 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1031533&action=edit Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM Description of problem: When following the steps in "Verifying checksums on Windows systems" the value of the `$expected_checksum` is 'sha256' because it is splitting the line and grabbing the first word. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 22, full URL in "Additional info". How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso. 2. Download Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM.txt. 3. Follow PowerShell instruction from "Verifying checksums on Windows systems". Actual results: `$expected_checksum` equals 'sha256'. PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $checksum_file = "Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM.txt" PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $image = "Fedora-Live-Workstation-x86_64-22-3.iso" PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum = ((Get-Content $checksum_file | Select-String -Pattern $image) -split " ")[0].ToLower() PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum sha256 Expected results: `$expected_checksum` equals '615abfc89709a46a078dd1d39638019aa66f62b0ff8325334f1af100551bb6cf'. PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum = ((Get-Content $checksum_file | Select-String -Pattern $image) -split " ")[3].ToLower() PS C:\Users\...\Downloads> $expected_checksum 615abfc89709a46a078dd1d39638019aa66f62b0ff8325334f1af100551bb6cf Additional info: I've attached the "Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM.txt" since it is not very large but it's from, https://getfedora.org/verify The "Verifying checksums on Windows systems" page is, https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/Installation_Guide/sect… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1146950] New: Test Bug
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Feb '16

01 Feb '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146950 Bug ID: 1146950 Summary: Test Bug Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-reference-guide Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: jhradile(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com This is just a test bug. Please, feel free to ignore it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1098298] New: Some problems in "Chapter 11. Storage pools"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '16

26 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098298 Bug ID: 1098298 Summary: Some problems in "Chapter 11. Storage pools" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-administration-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: bughunt(a)gluino.name QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com In: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administr… I want to create storage pools using virsh. Corrections: Create the storage pool definition - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "The path to a file system directory for storing guest image files. If this directory does not exist, virsh will create it." This is incorrect. "You have to create it afterwards using virsh" is correct. Create the local directory - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I create the directory under "/home" Documentation shows that "ls -la /guest_images" shows the directory having permissions "700". This is incorrect, the permissions are "755" (at least for me) Improvement: Maybe one should also add the output of ls --lcontext -la /guest_images/ drwxr-xr-x. 2 system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 . drwxr-xr-x. 5 system_u:object_r:home_root_t:s0 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 .. The wrong permissions error is repeated under "6. Verify the storage pool configuration": ls -la /guest_images/ total 8 drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 . drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 May 15 18:50 .. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 990252] New: incomplete index for Virtualization Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '16

26 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990252 Bug ID: 990252 Summary: incomplete index for Virtualization Administration Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-administration-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: stephent98(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Description of problem: The index for the Virtualization Administration Guide has only three entries. Specifically, I was trying to find information on host memory requirements. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/html/Virtualization_Administr… How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1068889] New: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jan '16

26 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1068889 Bug ID: 1068889 Summary: Remove references to version numbers in package documentation directories Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-and-administrative-guide Assignee: lnovich(a)redhat.com Reporter: sclark(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lnovich(a)redhat.com Created attachment 866496 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=866496&action=edit The attached archive contains patches to implement this change Following instructions in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UnversionedDocdirs remove the version number from the directory name for all references to any package documentation directory in /usr/share/doc , leaving just the package's name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1217953] New: '--nombr' option from bootloader keyword in kickstart file is not documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '16

21 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1217953 Bug ID: 1217953 Summary: '--nombr' option from bootloader keyword in kickstart file is not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: franta(a)hanzlici.cz QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: 'ksverdiff -f F20 -t F21' command (among others) print: " The following options were added to the bootloader command in F21: --disabled --nombr " But F21 'Installation Guide' in "A.2.2. bootloader" chapter: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/sect-… not mention '--nombr' option for this keyword. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F21 Installation Guide (above URL) ksverdiff from pykickstart-1.99.65-2.fc21.noarch Additional info: - for unknown reason, RH Bugzilla offers only 'devel' version for this issue, although I want report it again F21. - of course, there may be bug somewhere in 'ksverdiff'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1214964] New: Hold Option to select boot source on Mac hardware
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Jan '16

21 Jan '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214964 Bug ID: 1214964 Summary: Hold Option to select boot source on Mac hardware Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: beland(a)alum.mit.edu QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co I'm not sure where to find the draft of the Fedora 22 Installation Guide, but I went through the Fedora 21 version steps in order to install the beta today. One suggestion for the new version of this page: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Installation_Guide/chap-… I recommend adding something like "On Mac hardware, hold down Option to enter the boot media selection menu." Mac hardware with Intel chips is rather common now, so I hope a significant number of people would be aided by that addition. I spent several hours trying to figure that out the first time I put Fedora on a Macbook. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1180524] New: confining users section unclear
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '15

04 Dec '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180524 Bug ID: 1180524 Summary: confining users section unclear Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: selinux-user-guide Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Reporter: nmavrogi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mprpic(a)redhat.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co The section 6 (confining users) in Fedora 21 documentation of SELinux is very unclear. 1. What does confining mean actually? How are they confined? What capabilities these user lose? These are crucial information, never discussed in the text. 2. In fedora with "seinfo -u" I see several selinux users. These, along with the limitation each has, are never discussed. 3. "6.5. xguest: Kiosk Mode": I miss some technical info on the restrictions of the xguest account. What that user can't do and what can it do. Without that information the text could just say, trust us we've done everything for you (nothing bad with it, except that in technical documentation you expect more). 4. I miss a "confining a server process/app" section. This is a very common usage for selinux but no information is provided about that at all. Can I put some server in a confined state, as the documentation discusses with the user? Do we provide some preconfigured selinux users, roles, types for that purpose? What about the sandbox tool we ship? That would be the information I'd expect from such a section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1180142] New: issues in the introduction of selinux-user-guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '15

03 Dec '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180142 Bug ID: 1180142 Summary: issues in the introduction of selinux-user-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: selinux-user-guide Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Reporter: nmavrogi(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mprpic(a)redhat.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co [Originally sent to authors of the document] I was trying to understand selinux using that guide, and had quite some issues in the introduction. I send you my issues in the hope they will help to improve the text. ------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 2. Introduction to SELinux: I couldn't really understand what is selinux based on this section. It says it is mandatory access control mechanism, and then it goes into length explaining the 'Discretionary Access Control (DAC) system' used typically in Linux. That's nice if you already know what selinux is, because you can see the difference, but the opposite what I'd expect at the moment since I have no idea what selinux is. My suggestion would be to add the description I saw in https://www.imperialviolet.org/2009/07/14/selinux.html "SELinux is fundamentally about answering questions of the form “May x do y to z?” and enforcing the result (x is subject, z is object) ... The action (y) boils down to a class and a permission. Each class can have up to 32 permissions (because they are stored as a bitmask in a 32-bit int). Examples of classes are FILE, TCP_SOCKET and X_EVENT. For the FILE class, some examples of permissions are READ, WRITE, LOCK etc." At least for me that was all the information that I needed to understand what I can do with SELinux. A complete pictures may require to go into a bit more length with explaining what can be a subject, object and actions. Then mentioning about MAC and explaining it in addition to DAC will be more natural IMO. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.1. Benefits of running SELinux This is section vaguely defines domain. I reached "3.1. Domain Transitions" and didn't know what a domain was. Maybe add a definition of domain in 3.1 or earlier in the introduction. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 3. SELinux Contexts level: It explains that in Fedora there is a single sensitivity and multiple categories. I miss what are these categories intended to be used to? An example with two different categories would be helpful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1231578] New: No valid SHA1 checksums in checksum file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Nov '15

26 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231578 Bug ID: 1231578 Summary: No valid SHA1 checksums in checksum file Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: misterfluff(a)me.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Following the installation procedure for Fedora 22 the section in 3,3,2 (verifying checksums on Linux and OS X systems) fails. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora-Live-Scientific_KDE-x86_64-22-3.iso How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Download Fedora-Live-Scientific_KDE-x86_64-22-3.iso from spins page 2. Download Fedora-Spins-x86_64-22-CHECKSUM 3. shasum -a 256 -c *CHECKSUM Actual results: Fedora-Spins-x86_64-22-CHECKSUM: no properly formatted SHA1 checksum lines found Expected results: Success, of course...:) Additional info: Additional checksum file Fedora-Workstation-22-x86_64-CHECKSUM file gave same result. Also performed "curl https://getfedora.org/static/fedora.gpg | gpg --import" with no change in eventual result. Is the process the same for checking a spin install versus the regular workstation? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1222305] New: Release notes scattered with references to YUM. DNF replaces yum
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222305 Bug ID: 1222305 Summary: Release notes scattered with references to YUM. DNF replaces yum Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: high Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The release notes on the web are not current and do not match the Fedora 22 release. The release notes within the Fedora 22 /usr/share/doc are also refering to Fedora 19 in places. In preparation for Fedora 22 release notes it looks like someone searched for Fedora 21 and changed the 21 to 22. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008149] New: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage for storing guest images to be migrated
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008149 Bug ID: 1008149 Summary: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage for storing guest images to be migrated Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: jrodrigosm(a)yahoo.es QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, In the Fedora 19 "Virtualization Getting Started Guide", section 2.2 ("What is migration?"), URL http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Virtualization_Getting_S… In the paragraph right before the 2.2.1 title, it is stated that "In Fedora 19, shared storage is not necessary for storing guest images to be migrated. With live storage migration [...]". But in the last paragraph of the page, right before the note, it is stated that "Shared, networked storage must be used for storing guest images to be migrated. Without shared storage, migration is not possible." These two statements seem contradictory to me. I just started learning about virtualization, so I am unable to propose an alternative. But I do think some clarification is needed. Thanks, Rodrigo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1206351] New: dnf conversion tracker bug
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206351 Bug ID: 1206351 Summary: dnf conversion tracker bug Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: striker(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Additional information: Tracker for individual documentation blockers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1206805] New: convert yum commands to dnf commands - System Administrators Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206805 Bug ID: 1206805 Summary: convert yum commands to dnf commands - System Administrators Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: striker(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1206351 External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1206351 Description of problem: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Sys… Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1193135] New: Review Comments on Multiboot Guide version 0.1
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '15

02 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193135 Bug ID: 1193135 Summary: Review Comments on Multiboot Guide version 0.1 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: multiboot-guide Severity: low Assignee: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org Reporter: scmccann2000(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org Created attachment 992259 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=992259&action=edit smccann comments to multiboot guide. Attaching a pdf with a few comments from the perspective of a newbie to both Fedora and multiboot. In general, very readable and understandable guide! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1180202] New: Overlap with uefi-secure-boot-guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '15

02 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180202 Bug ID: 1180202 Summary: Overlap with uefi-secure-boot-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: multiboot-guide Assignee: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org With the recent updates, there is now some overlap with the UEFI Secure Boot guide. I'm not sure the current state of Secure Boot is useful for non-dual-boot systems, considering the feature loss and the lack of additional security due to buggy kernels and permissive signed bootloaders from other vendors. Perhaps merging the UEFI Secure Boot guide into the multiboot guide makes sense? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1086052] New: Include a section on using the Live media for rescue
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '15

02 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086052 Bug ID: 1086052 Summary: Include a section on using the Live media for rescue Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The install guide contains a section that documents how one can use the rescue mode off the dvd. It doesn't document how one can use the live media for simple rescue operations. The most common use case is when people install Window after installing Fedora off a live media. They lose grub, and they can't figure out how to use the live media to reinstall it. There are a couple of blog posts that document it. For example: http://thecreationist.expertscolumn.com/article/recover-grub-using-fedora-l… It would maybe be a good idea to have a section in docs that provides hints on how the live cd can be used for basic rescue operations. Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1162233] New: http://beeblebrox.org/ appears to be dead
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Nov '15

01 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162233 Bug ID: 1162233 Summary: http://beeblebrox.org/ appears to be dead Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: readme-burning-isos Assignee: zach(a)oglesby.co Reporter: rbiba(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: HashTab can't be downloaded from http://beeblebrox.org/ because the page fails to load. It seems the site has been decommissioned. The software is now available from https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hashtab/id517065482 or http://implbits.com/products/hashtab/. Note that implbits.com is also the first Google search result for beeblebrox.org or hashtab. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 982906] New: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '15

22 Oct '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982906 Bug ID: 982906 Summary: 7.3.2. Establishing a Wireless Connection Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Assignee: jhradile(a)redhat.com Reporter: im_dracula(a)hotmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 7.3.2 under the heading: 'Saving Your New (or Modified) Connection and Making Further Configurations' it states: "You can further configure an existing connection by selecting it in the Network Connections window and clicking Edit to return to the Editing dialog." This could be clarified by stating that network connections can be found under: activities --> applications --> sundry --> network connections -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 1192174] New: Unhelpful links on LXDE spin page
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192174 Bug ID: 1192174 Summary: Unhelpful links on LXDE spin page Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: jhhaynes(a)earthlink.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Several "how to use this file" links on the LXDE spins web page simply point to the top Fedora documentation page. This is unhelpful when you need to know how to use this file. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): F21 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Bring up F21 LXDE spin web page 2.Click on any "how to use this file link" 3. Actual results: Gets to top of Fedora documentation tree Expected results: Should tell exactly how to use this file Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1152883] New: Local replication of Product installation trees
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152883 Bug ID: 1152883 Summary: Local replication of Product installation trees Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co It doesn't look like there will be a DVD image, the traditional source in our instructions for site-provided installation repos. Consider conjuring up a procedure explaining how an administrator could obtain a mirror of the installation tree for each Product (whatever anaconda is pointed at for the netinstalls) without having to pull in the entire repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Sep '15

27 Sep '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158 Bug ID: 979158 Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-guide Severity: high Priority: unspecified Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot adding scsi drive Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012 Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: using the previose version 1-52 works fine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 999762] New: Java FAQ
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '15

20 Jul '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999762 Bug ID: 999762 Summary: Java FAQ Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: pcsnow(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Parts of Java FAQ may need some updates. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):19 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: 1. JPackage does not seem updated since 2009 2. Intelllij complains that non-sun version has performance problems during install and recommends against use of OpenJDK. 3. It might be helpful to provide some assistance in docs to allow easy integration of Oracle Java using system-switch-java. The FAQ does not mention switch-java as an option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1001341] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001341 Bug ID: 1001341 Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pmachata(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883, 991919, 998564 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154 This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20. --- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT --- Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1) > Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two > weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, > iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?). Thanks. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 1001342] New: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001342 Bug ID: 1001342 Summary: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, pmachata(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 991875, 991877, 991878, 991879, 991882, 991883, 991919, 998564 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998564 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/F20Boost154 This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20. --- Additional comment from Petr Machata on 2013-08-19 11:30:25 EDT --- Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). --- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-08-20 08:57:28 EDT --- (In reply to Petr Machata from comment #1) > Current state: Boost has been rebased, most clients were rebuilt about two > weeks back. There are 7 broken boost dependencies as of now (fawkes, hugin, > iwhd, mrpt, pcl, python-tag, sumwars). Could you please set blocks/depends on for broken boost deps (if bug exists?). Thanks. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001169.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 9

[Bug 1001346] New: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001346 Bug ID: 1001346 Summary: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, steved(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 984718, 998566 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998566 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS The Linux Kernel has grown support for passing SELinux labels between a client and server using NFS. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001216.h… Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1001345] New: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001345 Bug ID: 1001345 Summary: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, steved(a)redhat.com, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 984718, 998566 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998566 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Enable SELinux Labeled NFS Support For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/LabeledNFS The Linux Kernel has grown support for passing SELinux labels between a client and server using NFS. Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001216.h… Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 1008221] New: Ryu Network Operating System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008221 Bug ID: 1008221 Summary: Ryu Network Operating System Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Keywords: Tracking Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, ymht.fedora(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998540 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998540 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Ryu Network Operating System For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Ryu Ryu Network Operating System http://osrg.github.com/ryu/ ------------------------------------ Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184930.html Please assess existing documentation for the impact of this Change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1008220] New: Ryu Network Operating System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008220 Bug ID: 1008220 Summary: Ryu Network Operating System Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Keywords: Tracking Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, ymht.fedora(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Depends On: 998540 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998540 +++ This is a tracking bug for Change: Ryu Network Operating System For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Ryu Ryu Network Operating System http://osrg.github.com/ryu/ ----------------------------- Discussion at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/184930.html Please document this Change in the Release Notes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 3

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (272 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1234615] New: There is no description on how to activate speech during installation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '15

22 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234615 Bug ID: 1234615 Summary: There is no description on how to activate speech during installation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: accessibility-guide Severity: medium Assignee: gerard(a)ryan.lt Reporter: brandonkeithbiggs(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: gerard(a)ryan.lt, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Under the screen reader section at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/14/html-single/Accessibility_Gu… There is no description on how to activate speech when one first installs Fedora. For example, Ubuntu requires one to press super+alt+s and Debian requires one to press s then hit enter in order to activate the text to speech capability. This is very clear in both the installation and accessibility manuals. If I could make a suggestion though: A mention in both the installation guide as well as in the accessibility guide on how to activate accessibility options before installing the OS would really help. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: I am installing a VM on VM Player on Windows. Steps to Reproduce: 1. load an ISO image 2. press alt+s, super+s, ctrl+s and all the combos like alt+super+s, alt+super+s+ctrl... 3. Actual results: Silence Expected results: Sound out of my speakers telling me what should happen. A line in the manual that tells me how to get the speech on the installer. Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 989059] New: PDF file content has been located at right half of page.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '15

22 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989059 Bug ID: 989059 Summary: PDF file content has been located at right half of page. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: dmitry_orekhov(a)mail.ru QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Description of problem: All content has been located at right half of page. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Virtualization_Getting_St… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/pdf/Virtualization_Security_G… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/pdf/Virtualization_Administra… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/pdf/Virtualization_Getting_St… http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/18/pdf/Virtualization_Security_G… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Jun '15

22 Jun '15

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (265 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 846864] New: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Jun '15

18 Jun '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846864 Bug ID: 846864 QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: devel Priority: unspecified CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: laine(a)redhat.com Summary: Need a list of toolsets and when they are appropriate in the virt Getting Started guide Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: laine(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Product: Fedora Documentation The Getting Started Guide needs an overview of all the different toolsets, and when each would be appropriate. In particular I'm talking about the following: 1) gnome-boxes 2) virt-manager 3) virsh, virt-install 4) ovirt 5) Should we point some people to OpenStack? I will write up a first draft of this, and hand it to a qualified docs person to edit and correctly place in the guide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Jun '15

15 Jun '15

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (258 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa June 2015