docs-qa July 2015

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
99 discussions

[Bug 1152883] New: Local replication of Product installation trees
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152883 Bug ID: 1152883 Summary: Local replication of Product installation trees Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co It doesn't look like there will be a DVD image, the traditional source in our instructions for site-provided installation repos. Consider conjuring up a procedure explaining how an administrator could obtain a mirror of the installation tree for each Product (whatever anaconda is pointed at for the netinstalls) without having to pull in the entire repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1244513] New: dnf rebuild --what to do to recover from database crash
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Sep '15

28 Sep '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244513 Bug ID: 1244513 Summary: dnf rebuild --what to do to recover from database crash Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: high Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Part way through dnf update the application emitted an error message along with instructions to perform a dnf rebuild. dnf rebuild is not in the man pages, or in Fedora Documents that I looked at. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Random or when dnf encounters a database inconsistancy Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: No information within Fedora documentation. Found information on the web Expected results: dnf rebuild should be part of the internal dnf options and should also be included in the man/info pages. Additional info: Found this information on the web... http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/rebuilding-corrupted-rpm-database.html rm -rf /var # cd /var/lib # rm __db* Rebuild RPM database: # rpm --rebuilddb # rpmdb_verify Packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 979158] New: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Sep '15

27 Sep '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979158 Bug ID: 979158 Summary: Windows Virtio Drivers version 1-59 blue screens windows when you hot add virtio drives Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-deployment-guide Severity: high Priority: unspecified Assignee: lbailey(a)redhat.com Reporter: robert.rupert(a)servicemesh.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: lbailey(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Windows Blue Screens in KVM when using the latest virtio driver 1-59. When hot adding scsi drive Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: fresh install with virtio scsi driver 1-59,=. Then hot add virtio scsi driver in windows 7, 2008r2 and 2012 Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: using the previose version 1-52 works fine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jul '15

27 Jul '15

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (300 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 999762] New: Java FAQ
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '15

20 Jul '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999762 Bug ID: 999762 Summary: Java FAQ Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: pcsnow(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: Parts of Java FAQ may need some updates. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java/FAQ?rd=JavaFAQ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):19 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: 1. JPackage does not seem updated since 2009 2. Intelllij complains that non-sun version has performance problems during install and recommends against use of OpenJDK. 3. It might be helpful to provide some assistance in docs to allow easy integration of Oracle Java using system-switch-java. The FAQ does not mention switch-java as an option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Jul '15

20 Jul '15

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (293 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1244419] New: id.fedoraproject. orĝ gives no context whatsoever
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '15

19 Jul '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244419 Bug ID: 1244419 Summary: id.fedoraproject.orĝ gives no context whatsoever Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: about-fedora Assignee: stickster(a)gmail.com Reporter: federicoleva(a)tiscali.it QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Sorry, did not find a suitable component. askbot sent me to https://id.fedoraproject.org/login/fas?ipsilon_transaction_id=d77111f9-fdd5… ; I think I had a login, but there is no "reset password" form. The page doesn't contain any information whatsoever about the system, other than a "fedora AuthN" logo at the top. https://id.fedoraproject.org/ doesn't give any clue either. It's therefore impossible for me to understand whether I should be here in the first place, where to look for information, how to register, how to recover credentials if I have them already, etc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '15

13 Jul '15

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (286 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '15

06 Jul '15

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (279 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa July 2015