docs-qa September 2017

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
61 discussions

[Bug 959626] New: config_name mismatch in mock example
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Dec '17

14 Dec '17

Product: Fedora Documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=959626 Bug ID: 959626 Summary: config_name mismatch in mock example Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: packager-guide Severity: low Priority: unspecified Assignee: pkovar(a)redhat.com Reporter: axilleas(a)archlinux.gr QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: fnadge(a)redhat.com Category: --- Description of problem: In section 2.4.3. Testing a Package with Mock, the last example uses the epel-6-x86_64 config whereas Fedora 18 is referenced above. According to the preamble, the example should read: mock -r fedora-18-x86_64 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/eject-2.1.5-0.1.fc18.src.rpm Link: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Pa… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1478340] New: Typo in the release notes
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 24 Oct '17

24 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478340 Bug ID: 1478340 Summary: Typo in the release notes Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: luan.cestari(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: I was reading the https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/Release_Notes/sect-chan… and found this typo "sceeen" Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: In the above link, more specific on the 2.3.1.1. Changes in the Graphical Interface section , search for "sceeen" Actual results:"sceeen" Expected results:"screen" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1246286] New: Outdated websites in "Further information"
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Oct '17

11 Oct '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246286 Bug ID: 1246286 Summary: Outdated websites in "Further information" Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: selinux-user-guide Assignee: mprpic(a)redhat.com Reporter: ah(a)riseup.net QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mprpic(a)redhat.com, pkennedy(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: http://selinuxnews.org seems hopelessly outdated. Last post is from 2012. The documentations on the NSA page are all from 2007 or older. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora 22, Edition 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 1

[Bug 1323502] New: Push fr "release-notes" and "welcome page" for f23
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Sep '17

25 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323502 Bug ID: 1323502 Summary: Push fr "release-notes" and "welcome page" for f23 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: publishing-requests Assignee: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: jb.holcroft(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs-publishers-members(a)fedoraproject.org Hi there, Can you please push french release-notes for f23 and welcome page please ? I tried by email then ticket, but it looks like I took the wrong group. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/382#comment:1 Thanks for your help -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

2 6

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 25 Sep '17

25 Sep '17

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1091 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 Sep '17

18 Sep '17

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1084 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1487659] New: Bugzilla: Missing permissions for bug reporting/ maintenance
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Sep '17

17 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487659 Bug ID: 1487659 Summary: Bugzilla: Missing permissions for bug reporting/maintenance Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: low Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: woiling(a)gmx.de QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: I now and then miss necessary permissions for bug reports or updates. For example I'm not allowed to change the version field or add keywords. In addition I was unable to find any documentation about the default permissions of users, of Fedoras Bugzilla nor on how to proceed with issues like this. (See Bug #1487287 for my first attempt to get support with this) How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Login to RH bugzilla as me ^^ (Maybe just create a new user and login) 2a. Try to add "CommonBugs" to the keywords of Bug #1441920 2b. Try to change version field of Bug #1259549 to 26 3. Notice the missing permissions to do so. Actual results: There is no way to change certain fields of bug reports for me (and assumable for default users) Expected results: At least the keyword field can be edited as suggested here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F26_bugs#My_bug_is_not_listed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Sep '17

11 Sep '17

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1077 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 04 Sep '17

04 Sep '17

The following is a list of bugs or attachments to bugs in which a user has been waiting more than 7 days for a response from you. Please take action on these requests as quickly as possible. (Note that some of these bugs might already be closed, but a user is still waiting for your response.) We'll remind you again in another 7 days if these requests are still outstanding, or if there are any new requests where users have been waiting more than 7 days for your response. review ------ Bug 1124344: yum --security update doesn't work on non-fedora repos. This limitation is probably undocumented. (1070 days old) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124344 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=942713&action=edit To see all your outstanding requests, visit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/request.cgi?action=queue&requestee=docs-qa%40li…

1 0

[Bug 1487885] New: rescue mode from hard drive or moving kernel before needed
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 02 Sep '17

02 Sep '17

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487885 Bug ID: 1487885 Summary: rescue mode from hard drive or moving kernel before needed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: Nick_Levinson(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Document URLs: <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/Installation_Guide/sect…> and <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/System_Administrators_G…>, both as accessed Aug. 12, 2017. Describe the issue: Booting into rescue mode is described as being done from media other than the hard drive. However, Fedora 26 installs the rescue kernel onto the hard drive and doesn't mention during installation that the user should move it to other media before a rescue is needed. So, either the rescue kernel is usable from the hard drive (and I used it once for a test, with no visible difference in outcome) or we should move it. Suggestions for improvement: Either way, the documentation should be clarified or updated for whichever possibility is applicable. If we should move the kernel, please tell us what we should move and how to organize relevant files on the alternative media. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa September 2017