docs-qa May 2024

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
100 discussions

[Bug 2094692] New: Older release link in the main page has error at Japanese language page
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094692 Bug ID: 2094692 Summary: Older release link in the main page has error at Japanese language page Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Component: homepage Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: qqke6wd9k(a)apricot.ocn.ne.jp QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: At Japanese translation Page of Doc start page, Only "Older release" is link error. so Page Not Found. Japanese Doc : https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ja/docs/ English-US Doc : https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/docs/ I already reported gitlab Fedora Docs page, but not response, so I report in Bugzilla, https://gitlab.com/fedora/docs/docs-website/pages/-/issues/1 not only Japanese but also fr, de , same link error happened. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: every times, Steps to Reproduce: 1. go https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/docs/ 2. change language from English to another non-English kanguage (ja ,fr,de, and so on) 3. click "older release" Actual results: If language is Japanese, the page go https://docs.fedoraproject.org/ja/Fedora/26/html/Release_Notes/index.html this is "page not found" page Expected results: go https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/26/html/Release_Notes/index.html Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094692

1 1

[Bug 2037234] New: [getfedora.org] Fedora help menu is not contextual to the current edition
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037234 Bug ID: 2037234 Summary: [getfedora.org] Fedora help menu is not contextual to the current edition Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: homepage Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pprinett(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: On all pages of getfedora.org I am presented with a blue header bar containing three menus: "Editions", "Help" and "Wiki". Those items are universal in the context of Fedora: when clicking on "Help->Documentation" for example, I am asked to choose from all possible help topics independently of the page I am currently seeing. This behaviour, which is easy to understand on the Fedora home page, can be confusing when I land (say, from a search engine) directly on the page of a specific Fedora edition. For example: upon landing on the Fedora IoT downloads page[1], I might want to check the docs. If I click on "Help->Documentation" (the only apparent link to the docs), I am presented a list of many products to choose from, whereas I expected to navigate in the context of Fedora IoT. Perhaps the problem could be solved by simply adding a "Documentation" link next to "Overview" and "Download" in the gray header bar, which (as opposed to the blue one) is apparently contextual to the specific edition I am seeing. [1]: https://getfedora.org/en/iot/download/ [2]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037234

1 2

[Bug 2037222] New: [getfedora.org] Fedora IoT download formats are not documented
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037222 Bug ID: 2037222 Summary: [getfedora.org] Fedora IoT download formats are not documented Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: homepage Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pprinett(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: On the Fedora IoT downloads page[1], I am presented with two formats: "Raw Images" versus "Installer ISOs". It is not explained why I would choose one over the other. [1]: https://getfedora.org/en/iot/download/ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Fedora IoT 35 How I got there: 1. I searched 'Fedora iot' in your favourite search engine 2. I landed on 'https://getfedora.org/iot/' 3. I clicked 'Download' in the top right-hand corner of the page Actual results: I am presented the two format options without any explanation Expected results: I am presented the download format that matches the documentation Additional info: In the Fedora IoT documentation[2], neither the words "Raw Image" nor "Installer ISO" seem to be ever mentioned. In both the "Getting Started" sections "Setting up a Virtual Machine" and "Setting up a Physical Device", the command-line examples refer to the downloaded file as `Ferora-IoT-[version].raw.xz` (and not .iso). [2]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/iot/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037222

1 2

[Bug 1997970] New: Typo on release page of a package on package.fedoraproject.org
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997970 Bug ID: 1997970 Summary: Typo on release page of a package on package.fedoraproject.org Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: homepage Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: eva.timbs(a)you-spam.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dimitris(a)glezos.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora When clicking on a release of a package the new site, e.g. [1], displays a back link near the top with the description "↵ Retrun to the main page of <pkg>". Note the misspelled "Return". [1] https://packages.fedoraproject.org/pkgs/kernel/kernel/fedora-rawhide.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 2011723] New: Backport fix to ps man page documentation
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011723 Bug ID: 2011723 Summary: Backport fix to ps man page documentation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: docs-requests Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: mallika.bachan(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Document URL: Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011723

1 2

[Bug 2279874] New: Typos in contributing-docs page
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279874 Bug ID: 2279874 Summary: Typos in contributing-docs page Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: documentation-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: pepper(a)reppep.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Document URL: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-docs/contributing-docs/ Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: Fedora documentation uses the Antora to build and manage the Web site. Fedora documentation uses Antora to build and manage the Web site. Documentation is once created static content, with updates from time to time. Documentation is FAIRLY static content, with OCCASIONAL updates from time to time. The AsciiDoc text document is stored in series of Git repositories. The AsciiDoc text document is stored in a series of Git repositories. Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279874 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 1

[Bug 1878577] New: Grammar Mistake
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878577 Bug ID: 1878577 Summary: Grammar Mistake Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: documentation-guide Severity: low Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ali.cruz(a)me.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: jhradile(a)redhat.com, pkovar(a)redhat.com, sparks(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Group: fedora_contrib_private Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1714711 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1714711&action=edit Grammar mistake Document URL: selinux-managing-confined-services-guide Section Number and Name: LOGO Describe the issue: DOUMENTACIÓN de Fedora Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: selinux-managing-confined-services-guide -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1901486] New: Release notes should mention fixes for older systems impacted by security tightening in F33
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901486 Bug ID: 1901486 Summary: Release notes should mention fixes for older systems impacted by security tightening in F33 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: release-notes Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: russ+bugzilla-redhat(a)gloomytrousers.co.uk QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: On booting my system after upgrade from F31 to F33, neither httpd nor dovecot would start. This system is quite an old one that's been upgraded through many versions of Fedora. This appears to be a result of "Strong Crypto Settings - Phase 2" mentioned on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f33/release-notes/sysadmin/Secu… The relevant errors were: * Apache (/var/log/httpd/error_log): [Mon Nov 23 11:44:11.517501 2020] [ssl:emerg] [pid 13680:tid 13680] AH02562: Failed to configure certificate gigalith.gloomytrousers.co.uk:443:0 (with chain), check /etc/pki/tls/certs/localhost.crt [Mon Nov 23 11:44:11.517525 2020] [ssl:emerg] [pid 13680:tid 13680] SSL Library Error: error:140AB18F:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_certificate:ee key too small This cert was 1024 bit, first generated in 2010. The fix was to remove /etc/pki/tls/certs/localhost.crt and /etc/pki/tls/private/localhost.key then run /usr/libexec/httpd-ssl-gencerts. * Dovecot (journal): Nov 23 12:35:27 gigalith.gloomytrousers.co.uk dovecot[31160]: config: Warning: please set ssl_dh=</etc/dovecot/dh.pem Nov 23 12:35:27 gigalith.gloomytrousers.co.uk dovecot[31160]: config: Warning: You can generate it with: dd if=/var/lib/dovecot/ssl-parameters.dat bs=1 skip=88 | openssl dhparam -inform der > /etc/dovecot/dh.pem /etc/dovecot/dh.pem was present, dating from from 2013. The recommended fix did NOT work (I recall having run this in the past) - it just generated an identical file. The actual fix (stumbled across in bug 1882939) was to regenerate the DH params with `openssl dhparam -out /etc/dovecot/dh.pem 4096` (this took 32 mins on my machine!) I suspect Exim might also have similar problems for some people, although I didn't have a problem (my cert was 2048 bit from 2010, although I think I generated this in a non-default way at the time). The fix in this case would be to remove /etc/pki/tls/certs/exim.pem and /etc/pki/tls/private/exim.pem then run /usr/libexec/exim-gen-cert. I suggest these workarounds which might be required for older systems be documented on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f33/release-notes/sysadmin/Secu… - along with anything else that might suffer from similar issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 2021927] New: Updates and enhancements needed
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021927 Bug ID: 2021927 Summary: Updates and enhancements needed Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Status: NEW Component: freeipa-guide Severity: medium Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: ricky.tigg(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: mkosek(a)redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Created attachment 1841070 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1841070&action=edit Observations and suggestions Hello. Here is a well composed and written document that has aged without having suffered hard the passage of time. Well done. According to my observations, some few sections deserve to be up-to-date as they lead the reader to conclude that the guide is obsolete and therefore do not apply to contemporary release of Fedora products. Who knows, maybe the required rectifications could be produced in correlation with the up-coming releases of Fedora 36 products – that’s Fedora 2x18! Source: https://docs.fedoraproject.org | Fedora 18 | Edition 3.1.5 | Ella Deon Lackey | Release year: 2012 | Version number of component freeipa this document was made against: 2.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021927

1 2

[Bug 1815635] New: Fedora 31 bluetooth stopped working
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815635 Bug ID: 1815635 Summary: Fedora 31 bluetooth stopped working Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: technical-notes Severity: high Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: super250(a)g.uky.edu QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: bluetooth stopped working Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 31 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.\<edit\> /usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service \<add '-d' to ExecStart line as option to bluetoothd\> 2. systemctl daemon-reload 3. systemctl restart bluetooth (Capture the logs to put in bugzilla report) journalctl -r -u bluetooth > /tmp/bluetoothd.out Actual results: bluetooth.service: Service has no ExecStart=, ExecStop=, or SuccessAction=. Refusing Expected results: bluetooth.service - Bluetooth service Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/bluetooth.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Wed 2017-10-04 16:07:40 EDT; 1 day 22h ago Docs: man:bluetoothd(8) Main PID: 27427 (bluetoothd) Status: "Running" Tasks: 1 (limit: 4915) CGroup: /system.slice/bluetooth.service └─27427 /usr/libexec/bluetooth/bluetoothd Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa May 2024