docs-qa October 2015

docs-qa@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
112 discussions

[Bug 1249314] New: yumex-dnf is not following the install only_limit config parameter default 3
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '15

18 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249314 Bug ID: 1249314 Summary: yumex-dnf is not following the install only_limit config parameter default 3 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: software-management-guide Severity: medium Assignee: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Reporter: totalitout(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64; rv:39.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/39.0 Build Identifier: Using yumex-dnf when installing an updated kernel, the oldest kernel is not removed. All kernels remain installed, apparently without limit. The default to keep only the 3 newest kernels is ignored. Running: dnf update removes excess kernels, the limit of 3 is observed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open yumex-dnf, run update. 2.Reboot to load updated kernel. 3.Kernel list displays more than 3 installed kernels. Actual Results: More than 3 kernels remain installed. The install only_limit config parameter default 3 is ignored. Expected Results: Oldest kernel should be removed. No more than 3 kernels should remain installed. No error message. Didn't have any indication of a problem except when rebooting noticed the excess kernels listed. This needs to be fixed. It could cause unaware users to run out of space in their /boot partition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1222305] New: Release notes scattered with references to YUM. DNF replaces yum
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222305 Bug ID: 1222305 Summary: Release notes scattered with references to YUM. DNF replaces yum Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: high Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: lsatenstein(a)yahoo.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The release notes on the web are not current and do not match the Fedora 22 release. The release notes within the Fedora 22 /usr/share/doc are also refering to Fedora 19 in places. In preparation for Fedora 22 release notes it looks like someone searched for Fedora 21 and changed the 21 to 22. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1266636] New: Link for update-crypto-policies needs updated.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Nov '15

09 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266636 Bug ID: 1266636 Summary: Link for update-crypto-policies needs updated. Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: release-notes Severity: medium Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: sheldon.corey(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The anchor link for the update-crypto-policies referencing the rc4 ciphers and such is dead. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): only found in 23 How reproducible: Always in R/N for 23 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Navigate to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/23/html/Release_Notes/sect-Rele… 2. Click on the `update-crypto-policies' hyperlink 3. 404 page presented to you. Actual results: should redirect to https://github.com/nmav/fedora-crypto-policies/blob/master/update-crypto-po… Expected results: presented with a github 404 error page Additional info: Merely needs fixing /updating of the reference link. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1008149] New: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage for storing guest images to be migrated
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008149 Bug ID: 1008149 Summary: Contraficting info about the need of shared storage for storing guest images to be migrated Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: virtualization-getting-started-guide Assignee: dayleparker(a)redhat.com Reporter: jrodrigosm(a)yahoo.es QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: dayleparker(a)redhat.com, docs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, In the Fedora 19 "Virtualization Getting Started Guide", section 2.2 ("What is migration?"), URL http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/19/html/Virtualization_Getting_S… In the paragraph right before the 2.2.1 title, it is stated that "In Fedora 19, shared storage is not necessary for storing guest images to be migrated. With live storage migration [...]". But in the last paragraph of the page, right before the note, it is stated that "Shared, networked storage must be used for storing guest images to be migrated. Without shared storage, migration is not possible." These two statements seem contradictory to me. I just started learning about virtualization, so I am unable to propose an alternative. But I do think some clarification is needed. Thanks, Rodrigo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1270597] New: Systeam admin guide has wrong info for ssl certificate generation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270597 Bug ID: 1270597 Summary: Systeam admin guide has wrong info for ssl certificate generation Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Severity: high Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: pgaltieri(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Section 9.1.7.4. Generating a New Key and Certificate of system admin user guide has incorrect information on how to create SSL certificates. There are several issues. 1) requires you to use yum to install packages 2) requires you to install package crypto-tools which does not exist 3) requires you to use program genkey which doesn't exist Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Edition 1 of online admin guide https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/System_Administrators_G… How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Read https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/22/html/System_Administrators_G… 2. goto section 9.1.7.4 3. Actual results: Provides wrong information Expected results: Correct infor on how to create an SSL certificate Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 1206351] New: dnf conversion tracker bug
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206351 Bug ID: 1206351 Summary: dnf conversion tracker bug Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: docs-requests Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: striker(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org, sparks(a)redhat.com, stickster(a)gmail.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Additional information: Tracker for individual documentation blockers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 1206805] New: convert yum commands to dnf commands - System Administrators Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '15

05 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206805 Bug ID: 1206805 Summary: convert yum commands to dnf commands - System Administrators Guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: system-administrator's-guide Assignee: swadeley(a)redhat.com Reporter: striker(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: swadeley(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1206351 External Bug ID: Red Hat Bugzilla 1206351 Description of problem: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Sys… Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 1193135] New: Review Comments on Multiboot Guide version 0.1
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '15

02 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193135 Bug ID: 1193135 Summary: Review Comments on Multiboot Guide version 0.1 Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: multiboot-guide Severity: low Assignee: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org Reporter: scmccann2000(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org Created attachment 992259 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=992259&action=edit smccann comments to multiboot guide. Attaching a pdf with a few comments from the perspective of a newbie to both Fedora and multiboot. In general, very readable and understandable guide! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1180202] New: Overlap with uefi-secure-boot-guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '15

02 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180202 Bug ID: 1180202 Summary: Overlap with uefi-secure-boot-guide Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: multiboot-guide Assignee: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org Reporter: fweimer(a)redhat.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: chris.roberts(a)croberts.org With the recent updates, there is now some overlap with the UEFI Secure Boot guide. I'm not sure the current state of Secure Boot is useful for non-dual-boot systems, considering the feature loss and the lack of additional security due to buggy kernels and permissive signed bootloaders from other vendors. Perhaps merging the UEFI Secure Boot guide into the multiboot guide makes sense? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 1086052] New: Include a section on using the Live media for rescue
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '15

02 Nov '15

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086052 Bug ID: 1086052 Summary: Include a section on using the Live media for rescue Product: Fedora Documentation Version: devel Component: install-guide Assignee: pbokoc(a)redhat.com Reporter: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org CC: pbokoc(a)redhat.com, zach(a)oglesby.co Description of problem: The install guide contains a section that documents how one can use the rescue mode off the dvd. It doesn't document how one can use the live media for simple rescue operations. The most common use case is when people install Window after installing Fedora off a live media. They lose grub, and they can't figure out how to use the live media to reinstall it. There are a couple of blog posts that document it. For example: http://thecreationist.expertscolumn.com/article/recover-grub-using-fedora-l… It would maybe be a good idea to have a section in docs that provides hints on how the live cd can be used for basic rescue operations. Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.

1 5

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

docs-qa October 2015