On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 01:26:59AM +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
On 08/26/2008 01:16 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:10:14AM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Seriously speaking, the main difficulty in maintaining packages, is the total absence of feedback from users *before* any updates.
Well yes, that is the problem. I'm aware of a number of OCaml / EPEL users. They mainly seem to be people using it to teach university courses ...
Rich.
Maybe you could leave the older ocaml as such and create a new ocaml5 ?
That's another possibility. But I've never seen a working parallel OCaml compiler install. It's definitely not as easy as it is with gcc to do parallel / compat installs ... A question for upstream, I think.
Rich.
-- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
I know we have at least 1 app ( maybe more) that would work a lot better with the newer version, (like it would build). I'll vote for the update.
stahnma