On 15.01.2008 20:21, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.01.2008 20:01, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.01.2008 19:23, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.01.2008 19:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > /topic EPEL SIG Meeting | permission to use spec files in other projects > | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/Tasks/Misc Does anybody still care? Seems the Board either do not understand what we/I'm up to or they ignore it.
No one but you sees a problem. It's covered by the CLA.
Please explain to me: What meaning has the CLA (a contract between a Fedora contributer and Fedora/Red Hat) to someone else that receives software from Fedora? I'm not familiar with US law, but in Germany a contract between A and B has no meaning to C.
CLA is not just a contract between A and B or more specifically it allows the same rights to all recipients which in this case would include C. I believe spot already explained that in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00031....
Which I replied to in https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-January/msg00032.... with the words: [...] I can't know if the all work I get from Fedora was submitted by someone that signed the CLA. [...]
All the work definitely isn't but spec files would be.
Then I'm sure it can be written down to finally solve the iossue?
That is the only thing you are worried about. Right?
I think that's what people were worried about when the issue came up on this list.
CU knurd