Could someone update the GNU Octave in the EPEL repository to the current version 3.6.4?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Suresh Raja sureshraja.cu@gmail.comwrote:
Could someone update the GNU Octave in the EPEL repository to the current version 3.6.4?
______________________________**_________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-**listhttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
File a bug in BZ agains octave in EPEL. Thanks!
-J
Quoting Suresh Raja sureshraja.cu@gmail.com:
Could someone update the GNU Octave in the EPEL repository to the current version 3.6.4?
Can't. The EPEL6 branch is at 3.4.3, and a version upgrade is not really allowed in the EPEL guidelines.
Once EPEL7 gets out, it will feature the then-newest version of Octave.
Susi Lehtola wrote:
Quoting Suresh Raja sureshraja.cu@gmail.com:
Could someone update the GNU Octave in the EPEL repository to the current version 3.6.4?
Can't. The EPEL6 branch is at 3.4.3, and a version upgrade is not really allowed in the EPEL guidelines.
Why not? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#A_major_version_upd...
Only mentions ABI changes or incompabilities. Is this newer version known to be incompatible in some way?
-- rex
On 04/11/2013 05:24 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Susi Lehtola wrote:
Quoting Suresh Raja sureshraja.cu@gmail.com:
Could someone update the GNU Octave in the EPEL repository to the current version 3.6.4?
Can't. The EPEL6 branch is at 3.4.3, and a version upgrade is not really allowed in the EPEL guidelines.
Why not? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#A_major_version_upd...
Only mentions ABI changes or incompabilities. Is this newer version known to be incompatible in some way?
Yes, it is ABI in-compatible.
I'm not sure what that means for Octave, which is an interpreted language. AFAIK, it would be unusual to be linking directly to Octave. So, I'm not sure an ABI break is meaningful in this context. But, I'm not a big octave user, so maybe I missed something.
On 12 April 2013 05:33, Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com wrote:
On 04/11/2013 05:24 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Susi Lehtola wrote:
Quoting Suresh Raja sureshraja.cu@gmail.com:
Could someone update the GNU Octave in the EPEL repository to the current version 3.6.4?
Can't. The EPEL6 branch is at 3.4.3, and a version upgrade is not really allowed in the EPEL guidelines.
Why not? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/**EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#A_** major_version_updatehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies#A_major_version_update
Only mentions ABI changes or incompabilities. Is this newer version known to be incompatible in some way?
Yes, it is ABI in-compatible.
-- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
______________________________**_________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/**mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-**listhttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list
On 04/12/2013 07:33 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
I'm not sure what that means for Octave, which is an interpreted language. AFAIK, it would be unusual to be linking directly to Octave. So, I'm not sure an ABI break is meaningful in this context. But, I'm not a big octave user, so maybe I missed something.
octave defines a module API version. Binary modules compiled against one api will not load against a different version. We encode this with:
octave(api) = api-v48+
3.4.3 provides:
octave(api) = api-v45+
There was also a soname bump between 3.4 and 3.6 in the octave libraries which a couple other packages other than octave modules also link to.
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org