It was a configuration mix up that pulled in ALL the modules instead of just the default ones.It only lasted a week (I think) and has been fixed.It was just bad timing, nothing you could have done to prevent, or fix it.I thought we'd caught all the packages that were built that might have been affected, but I guess we didn't catch them all.
Troy_______________________________________________On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 7:26 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio@serjux.com> wrote:On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 09:34 +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 12:29:06AM +0100, Sérgio Basto napsal(a):
> > On Sat, 2022-06-11 at 17:25 +0000, bugzilla@redhat.com wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095649
> >
> > Hi,
> > for some reason the build on epel 8 to update ImageMagick-6.9.12
> > from
> > 48 to 50 (
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1972114 )
> > used perl-libs-4:5.32.1-471.module+el8.6.0+13324+628a2397 from I
> > guess
> > modules repo
>
> Interesting. I'm courious how it could happen. DNF rejects installing
> modular
> packages if they are not listed in a defintion of a module stream. So
> either
> somebody enabled perl:5.32 stream explicitly (improbable), or mock
> repositories in Koji are configured with module_hotfixes=true which
> is alarming.
"Koji are configured with module_hotfixes=true" , but usually don't
push perl:5.32 stream , why this time it was pushed ? how I can avoid
it ?
Thank you
> Koji configuration confirm the other theory:
>
> $ koji mock-config -a x86_64 --target epel8-candidate | grep
> module_hotfixes
> config_opts['yum.conf'] =
> '[main]\ncachedir=/var/cache/yum\ndebuglevel=1\nlogfile=/var/log/yum.
> log\nreposdir=/dev/null\nretries=20\nobsoletes=1\ngpgcheck=0\nassumey
> es=1\nkeepcache=1\ninstall_weak_deps=0\nstrict=1\n\n#
> repos\n\n[build]\nname=build\nbaseurl=
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8-
> build/4655904/x86_64\nmodule_hotfixes=1\n'
>
> I recommend Koji maintainers to add and use RHEL repositories next to
> epel8-build with EPEL8 packages:
>
> [build]
> name=build
> baseurl=
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/epel8-build/4655904/x86_64
>
> [rhel-AppStream]
> name=rhel-AppStream
> baseurl=WHEREVER_FEDORA_TAKES_RHEL8_PACKAGES_FROM
>
> -- Petr
>
> _______________________________________________
> epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure