Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488665
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2009-03-10 07:15:01 EDT
---
[ok, take2: first attempt to reply earlier disappeared with firefox...]
(In reply to comment #1)
Thanks - fixing.
IMO the upstream maintains a nice website.
Agreed better to use an upstream website when available and up to date.
ghc-hscolour-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
ghc-hscolour-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-hscolour-devel
These can be waived I think.
hscolour.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/HsColour
0775
Reproduced and still investigating.
hscolour.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/HsColour
Yes, I think this is common to ghc executables.
I checked and alex, cabal-install, cpphs, ghc, darcs, happy, etc
all have this too.
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should
be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. [14]
Fail: See above rpmlint
Fixing with %attr for now anyway.
SPEC:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/hscolour/hscolour.spec
SRPM:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/hscolour/hscolour-1.12-2.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.