https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com --- I think it might be better to call the package "Elm".
At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended in the Haskell Guidelines. (Failing that probably need to replace %{name} with %{pkg_name} in various places in the spec file.)
haskell-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org