Cantas open source card app?
by Paul W. Frields
I separately had both Adam Miller and Stephen Smoogen ask me about
"card" based project tracking applications. I responded to both that
there's a 100% open source app for that called Cantas:
https://github.com/onepiecejs/nodejs-cantas
I believe the major portion of its dependencies are all in Fedora
already, probably thanks in part to Ralph Bean sorting through a ton
of nodejs stuff earlier.
I've seen numerous folks using apps like this, or Trello, or other
similar, to get development done faster and with good accountability.
Sometimes they're using Agile with a big A, sometimes they're just
trying to be more agile with a little a.
I think Adam's intent was to try to use this kind of system for
upcoming projects that involve Fedora rel-eng and infrastructure. If
Fedora data like that is in it, I'd love to see that eventually be
tracked in Fedora itself. While it doesn't have to be a blocker to
moving forward, it could end up being useful to more people.
Is this of interest to anyone else in Fedora Infrastructure?
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
9 years, 1 month
Upstream for dist-git [RFC]
by Miroslav Suchý
Hi,
Adam Šamalík took dist-git files from fedora-infra ansible.git. He separated what belongs to dist-git itself and what is
Fedora specific and with cooperation of Dan Mach and Palo Babinčák he created upstream for dist-git:
https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git
This is first attempt and request for comments.
The changes from ansible.git version are described here:
https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/blob/master/changes.txt
and he extracted some code to be configuration driven:
https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/blob/master/configs/dist-...
Feel free to experiment with this project and we are looking for your questions and comments.
I have one question thou:
There is no license information in files header but two files:
scripts/httpd/upload.cgi - GPLv1
scripts/dist-git/pkgdb_sync_git_branches.py - GPLv2+
Everything else is without license.
Can I assume that we can realease the code under GPLv2+?
The author of upload.cgi seems to be Kevin F. - Kevin, are you willing to change license your file to GPLv2+ so we have
uniform license across all files?
Future plans:
1) Listen to your initial feedback and do alternations according to your feedback
2) After license clarification, announce this project to Red Hat and CentOS rel-engs and ask them to merge their
changes of dist-git to this upstream.
3) Get this package into Fedora distribution
4) Change Fedora dist-git server to use this package.
....
10) Enjoy the benefits of common upstream.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
9 years, 1 month
Freeze Break: increase bodhi timeout on releng04/relepel01
by Kevin Fenzi
I'm really not sure why they have become so slow, but releng04 and
relepel01 are now timing out when trying to push updates. :(
Until Luke is back and able to take a closer look, I just upped the
timeouts on both of them from 300 to 900 seconds so we could get
updates out.
I can put this in as a hotfix, or we can see if Luke can figure out the
slowdown first.
Anyhow, retroactive +1s?
kevin
--
--- /usr/bin/bodhi 2015-04-17 14:18:24.611000665 +0000
+++ /home/fedora/kevin/bodhi.orig 2015-04-17 15:10:16.917000664
+0000 @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@
setup_logger(opts.verbose)
bodhi = BodhiClient(opts.bodhi_url, username=opts.username,
debug=opts.verbose)
- bodhi.timeout = 900
+ bodhi.timeout = 300
def verify_args(args):
if not args and len(args) != 1:
9 years, 1 month
Fedora Cloud questions and proposal
by Miroslav Suchý
I have few questions regarding how we plan to use our new Fedora Cloud:
1) Do we want to use Swift there? How much space we should allocate for Swift storage?
2) How should I configure /var/lib/nova/instances?
This is directory where RootFS, swap and ephemeral storages of instances are stored.
Right now fed-cloud09 have this path on root mount point where is 15 GB available. But it can be extended to whole size
of "vg_server" volume group, which is 383GB.
fed-cloud1X have now:
/dev/mapper/vg_guests-nova 3.2T 32G 3.0T 2% /var/lib/nova
This gives us accumulated (over controller and 6 compute nodes) storage of 18.4 TB storage.
However this setup does not allows live migration, because /var/lib/nova is not on shared FS.
So I propose that /var/lib/nova/instances is NFS exported from fed-cloud09 to all compute nodes. This will allow live
migrations of VMs. However this means that /var/lib/nova/instances on fed-cloud09 should be big enough to host all
rootfs, swaps and ephemeral devices for all VMs in Fedora Cloud. This is 3-20 GB per instance. so 383 GB is not enough.
Other disadvantage is that ephemeral devices will be on network storage and not so fast as local device. However I
suppose we do not use ephemeral storage too much (maybe not at all).
I would use /dev/md127 from fed-cloud09 (2.89 TB) for /var/lib/nova. This should be enough for approximately 287
instances. Which is cca accumulated capacity of our compute nodes. However it may slightly limit us in future if we ever
add more compute nodes.
I would suggest to use /dev/md127 (2.89TB raid6 storage) on fed-cloud1X(s) as storage for Swift. And configure Glance to
store images in Swift.
This have advantage that Swift can be set up to store more replicas. On the other hand this is little bit overkill. As
we would have 3TB+ (it depend how much replicas we will use) storage for Swift. However biggest consumer would be
Glance. And Glance in fed-cloud02 only consume 100GB currently.
What you like most, hove more space for /var/lib/nova as in current setup but without live migrations? Or smaller
storage, which on the other hand allows live migration?
Or you have better idea how to split disks and machines to different services?
P.S. I am putting aside normal volumes for data, which will reside in DellEqualogic which is 20TB. And it is perfectly fine.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
9 years, 1 month
Retrospective freeze break: Block riddler.io
by Patrick Uiterwijk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Earlier today, the riddler.io bot pulled Bodhi under by performing
a lot of heavy requests.
I know from experience that this bot does NOT listen to robots.txt,
even though the website says it does (it hit my personal webserver
as well at an earlier time), so I have currently blocked it by user
agent.
We probably need to fix this better soon, but for the time being I
put this in to make Bodhi behave again.
Any comments?
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
[puiterwijk@lockbox01 files]$ git show HEAD
commit a635e91849f29dd3c146b8067f602871ff959f00
Author: Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk(a)redhat.com>
Date: Fri Apr 17 11:29:48 2015 +0000
Block the Riddler.io bot from accessing bodhi
This bot does NOT follow robots.txt, even though it announces that
it does, and it hits Bodhi so much that it pulls the bodhi servers
under.
An email has been sent to the maintainer of the bot, but for the
time being, let's block it from using any bodhi resources.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk(a)redhat.com>
diff --git a/roles/bodhi/base/files/bodhi-app.conf b/roles/bodhi/base/files/bodhi-app.conf
index 3e10a59..3f44964 100644
- --- a/roles/bodhi/base/files/bodhi-app.conf
+++ b/roles/bodhi/base/files/bodhi-app.conf
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ Alias /updates/tg_widgets/tgmochikit/packed/MochiKit/MochiKit.js /usr/lib/python
<Directory /usr/share/bodhi>
WSGIProcessGroup bodhi
- - Order deny,allow
+ SetEnvIf User-Agent Riddler GoAway=1
+ Order allow,deny
Allow from all
+ Deny from env=GoAway
</Directory>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=QgK+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9 years, 1 month
db-koji01 slowness
by Kevin Fenzi
So, last weekend we rebooted bvirthost09 and db-koji01.
It helped somewhat.
Database dumps are back to a reasonable few hours.
However, it's still got high load and occasionally alerts and also now
it's sometimes causing builders to stop talking to the hub. (They
timeout and just stop checking in).
I've asked netapp folks to look and see if they can see any problems
with the iscsi lun that guest is on, but they say they are not aware of
any issues.
I do see some packet dropping on db-koji01:
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT qlen 1000
link/ether 52:54:00:06:90:a4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
RX: bytes packets errors dropped overrun mcast
65269562146 369724151 0 128685 0 0
TX: bytes packets errors dropped carrier collsns
395224051163 377221287 0 0 0 0
My only ideas at this point:
a) run another postgresql vacuum analyze. Perhaps the first one made
some poor choices and another one would make things happier. In any
case that shouldn't make things any worse.
b) Switch the network card on db-koji01 to e1000 instead of virtio-net.
This really shouldn't be needed, but perhaps we are hitting some weird
virtio-net bug. This would require a short outage.
c) Some other brilliant idea. ;)
kevin
9 years, 1 month
Updating puppet.txt with Ansible workflow
by mhurron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/211971/
The working document is above, at least to let it be looked over. Any
feedback is appreciated.
I'll set up a gobby session for it later so edits and additions can be
made to the document instead of emailing changes back and forth.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=1Ufs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
9 years, 1 month
Cleanup of directories on lockbox01
by Stephen John Smoogen
We nearly ran out of disk space on lockbox01 today so with Kevin's
approval, I removed the following directories from all homes
~/*/dns/
This directory is backed up so if we lost something you were working on we
should be able to get yesterdays version of it.
The DNS git repository is growing exponentially due to dnssec keys causing
every file to change largely. So at the moment the workflow to work on dns
should be:
1) git clone /git/dns
2) cd ./dns
3) make the fixes and changes you need.
4) git add .
5) ./do-domains
6) git add .
7) git commit -a -m 'I made the following changes'
8) git push
9) make sure changes worked.
10) cd .. ; rm -rf ./dns
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
9 years, 1 month
Plan for tomorrow's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2015-04-16)
by Kevin Fenzi
The infrastructure team will be having it's weekly meeting tomorrow,
2015-04-16 at 18:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on the freenode network.
This week we are continuing to try something new.
We have a gobby document
(see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby )
fedora-infrastructure-meeting-next is the document.
Please try and review and edit that document before the meeting and we
will use it to have our agenda of things to discuss. A copy as of this
morning is included in this email.
kevin
--
= Introduction =
This shared document is for the next fedora infrastructure meeting.
We will use it over the week before the meeting to gather status and
info and discussion items and so forth, then use it in the irc meeting
to transfer information to the meetbot logs.
= Meeting start stuff =
#startmeeting Infrastructure (2015-04-16)
#meetingname infrastructure
#topic aloha
#chair smooge relrod nirik abadger1999 lmacken dgilmore mdomsch
threebean pingou puiterwijk #topic New folks introductions / Apprentice
feedback
= Status / information / Trivia / Announcements =
(We put things here we want others on the team to know, but don't need
to discuss) (Please use #info <the thing> - your name)
#topic announcements and information
#info rebooted db-koji01 to help performance issues - kevin and smooge
#info Lots more various things to get performance on db-koji01 happy -
kevin #info Inactive apprentices removed for the month - kevin
#info Network outage in phx2 tuesday night, brought everything back -
kevin and smooge #info Lots of folks out at pycon this week
#info
= Things we should discuss =
We use this section to bring up discussion topics. Things we want to
talk about as a group and come up with some consensus or decision or
just brainstorm a problem or issue. If there are none of these we skip
this section.
(Use #topic your discussion topic - your username)
#topic
= Learn about some application or setup in infrastructure =
(This section, each week we get 1 person to talk about an application
or setup that we have. Just going over what it is, how to contribute,
ideas for improvement, etc. Whoever would like to do this, just add the
info in this section. In the event we don't find someone to teach about
something, we skip this section and just end the meeting.)
#topic Learn about fpaste - our pastebin application
= Meeting end stuff =
#topic Open Floor
#endmeeting
9 years, 1 month
Infra docs formatting
by Pete Travis
Hi there,
I'm working on a project[0] to build a documentation website using
buildbot. We have plenty of publican books for me to play with, but I'd
also like to enable other formats. ReStructuredText[1] seems like a
good first choice, as it's easy to learn and use (just squint and
pretend it's markdown, if you aren't familiar), and there are processors
for it at hand.
Anerist is centered around consuming git repositories. Ultimately, I'd
like the site to offer the both user and contributor facing
documentation. I also need a repo full of RST content to bang out
implementation details. infra-docs.git seems ideally positioned to help
out here, and any time invested would carry forward to the end product.
Each article would need some kind of header[2] to work at scale, though.
So, what does the infrastructure team think about writing in RST? If
I'm willing to convert everything over, are you willing to sustain it?
--Pete
[0] slowly, anyway... https://github.com/immanetize/anerist
[1] http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html
[1b] more digestable: http://www.getnikola.com/quickstart.html
[2] Probably something like
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/2015-March/016101.html,
discussion encouraged.
9 years, 1 month
