Thanks for doing the hard work of packaging this up... things are looking pretty good. I'll continue to work on the package review in the Bugzilla ticket.
One question I had was regarding the gateway software itself -- I think we probably need some sort of systemd initscript to start and stop the software, and some sort of instructions for people to get started. Thoughts?
-Jared
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:14 PM Troy Dawson tdawson@redhat.com wrote:
Fedora Review Requests:
- mozilla-iot-gateway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125
- nodejs-nanomsg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673126
Jared, if you could grab those two, I'd appreciate it. Since the gateway package has bundling, I'd appreciate someone who knows about bundling working on it. nodejs-nanomsg is just the standard binary nodejs package. But it's needed so that mozilla-iot-gateway can remain noarch.
Troy
On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:25 AM Peter Robinson pbrobinson@gmail.com wrote:
Please give a look. Especially the spec files. If they look good
I will do in in the next few days.
I'll work on getting them into Fedora, hopefully in time for F30 freeze.
I would much sooner if we could aim for much sooner than that to enable wider testing by interested parties. It's going to take time to do things like license review so the sooner we can get the spec up for review it will start to enable these things more formally. I don't expect the first version that lands in the repos proper to be perfect but it does enable easier testing by a wider audience and release early release often etc.
While obviously there's still work to be done I think it's in good enough shape to get the package review submitted and in motion.
Peter
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:24 AM Troy Dawson tdawson@redhat.com
wrote:
I believe I have this working now. I've tried it on a couple of x86_64 machines and it works great. I'm having some problems installing in on aarch64 (raspberry pi 3) machines. But I'm pretty sure it will work.
Here is the packages, spec files, and supporting scripts.
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29.no...
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-1.fc29.sr...
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.aarch64...
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.x86_64....
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg-4.0.2-2.fc29.src.rpm
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/nodejs-nanomsg.spec
Troy
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:06 PM Troy Dawson tdawson@redhat.com
wrote:
Two things: 1 - I'm calling the package mozilla-iot-gateway -- The reason for my final decision is that everything gets saved
in
~/.mozilla-iot Also, I haven't seen anything in it's documentation refering to it as things-gateway, other than that one webpage.
2 - As much as I liked removing the modules for over 400 modules, I just hit bug after bug after bug. Alot of our nodejs modules are
very
old. versions 0.7 when gateway needs 3.6, things like that. I'm going back to my original design of only unbundling the binary
(arch
dependent) modules.
I should have a workable package tomorrow.
Troy
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:10 AM Russell Doty rdoty@redhat.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 15:17 -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: > Next release of "gateway" is up, along with a corresponding
updated
> nodejs-nanomsg for all arches. > The source rpm[1] has been trimmed by 30M and built rpm[2] by > 20M. Ya!! > The spec file [3] has an updated license list with all the
licenses
> from the bundled modules. Oddly enough, I didn't find a
single GPL,
> though there was one LGPL. > It also has all the unbundled packages now as Requires, and
all the
> bundled packages as Provides: bundled(). Thus making the spec
file
> rather long. > I also went through and trimmed out all the cruft that didn't
need to
> be installed for gateway to run (.travis.yml, .babelrc, and
others)
> I also added how to run it as a regular user in the
%description
> area. > That's probrubly not the best place to put that, but I figured
it's a
> place a user can always see. > The script[4] to download, setup, trim and tar up the source
with
> it's > dependencies has been updated to use an external file, that is
a list
> of all the nodejs modules to pull out of the bundled > dependencies. It > also now goes as deep as it needs to in order to pull out all
those
> modules. > And there is the list of modules we are unbundeling.[5] > Here is where everything is. [6] > > These have been tested on aarch64 (rpi3b+) and x86_64. > > I haven't decided between things-gateway and
mozilla-iot-gateway.
Have you considered mozillathings-iot-gateway?
> Both have good reasons to be the right name. Honestly, I
might just
> flip a coin and let that decide. > If anyone has a strong preference for one or the other, let me
know.
> > Troy > > [1] - >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.src.rpm
> [2] - >
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-0.7.0-1.1.fc29.noarch.rpm
> [3] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway.spec > [4] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-tarball.sh
> [5] -
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/gateway-unbundle.list
> [6] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/ > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 1:39 PM Jared K. Smith < > jsmith@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 5:56 PM Troy Dawson <
tdawson@redhat.com>
> > wrote: > > > Here's a fun fact. > > > gateway depends on 1000 node_modules (exactly I believe) > > > I was able to unbundle 455 of those packages. Ya!! > > > Of course, that means that I have to have 455 lines of > > > "Requires:" and > > > 545 lines of "Provides: bundled()" in the spec file > > > Ya!!?? > > > This spec file just went from a lightweight to a sumo
wrestler in
> > > one day. > > > > That's the NodeJS way, unfortunately. I know the NodeJS SIG
was
> > working on a macro to automagically create the "Provides: > > bundled()" lines, but I really don't know if they ever got it > > working. > > > > -Jared > _______________________________________________ > IoT mailing list -- iot@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: >
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
IoT mailing list -- iot@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to
iot-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
IoT mailing list -- iot@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org
IoT mailing list -- iot@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to iot-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/iot@lists.fedoraproject.org