Help with the hadoop package review
by Robert Rati
Bjorn has been reviewing the hadoop package, but I haven't seen him
online for about a week now and there's been no comments on the review
BZ. I suspect he is on vacation. Would someone be willing to step in
and help out with the review? Maybe give it a review so there will be
less (no) work to do when Bjorn is able to look at it again?
Rob
10 years, 10 months
Maven auto Requires on hsqldb:hsqldb:1 in rawhide
by Gerard Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
One of my recent packages (smooks), has a dependency on hsqldb1
(mvn(hsqldb:hsqldb:1)). The requires gets generated automatically (for
the subpackage milyn-commons). In rawhide, it's not installable
because the autoRequires gets generated as mvn(hsqldb:hsqldb), and not
the versioned mvn(hsqldb:hsqldb:1) that's provided by the package
hsqldb1 (At least I think that's why the resolution fails). In F19,
this problem doesn't seem to occur.
Is there a way to force the requires on mvn(hsqldb:hsqldb:1) over the
unversioned version, or am I thinking about this the right way at all?
BuildRequires resolves fine if it's the versioned equivalent, but the
unversioned one fails. I've tried adding a Requires line to the
subpackage that needs it, but it didn't seem to work.
Should hsqldb1 provide mvn(hsqldb:hsqldb)? I'm not sure if that would
cause problems for hsqldb (without the 1), since that provides
mvn(org.hsqldb:hsqldb).
Has anybody got any ideas what's going wrong here?
Thanks a lot,
Gerard.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJR/uoEAAoJEG7cfkpivEoV7QYQAJvCvoa5yTcGpXk2pw6SuoFt
nozTR8PL+OfPQtD7F4v1xzmPgc9s0VC/XdNMSNFm0GeMaGh76madAYNNcA+m2Lvi
pAwQ6uwWIZgKmgLMM1wo2Ig1WZRSYmn7UURNshKHzd2deL+xfZv5Sqnpv5JHeeHI
SxLmvo9gsH2dtfaAe0sVPp8pTwZsD6ED6pcRpS0aUe2ZKJUpQfkcek3boiBs0SnN
J283hEsTDxk+qQ6/B5TYE5Mu7h0UIzwRMXcs6Awo+7u9kDO+FCM4wt8fbqXwgj5t
yvGzvcuvbDeIZYOcVb9MLIB13C1tYYXo0Mh6ZcUbjrYZOSPXb1VwWBwUd3WXWlUR
eEIWyib3L0akyIDyujvr+nHJ+Qi2sK/VuvFpHzBTWBarVUOfIi6GLPuJjicdHi9i
8MYKA62VCTIDSJPqq8hRs+sQFQLvPeV09YW+nqkOxNvwUwmY11jDN6h8AlG0vmzf
C9h554tw43uM37FpLCgFQ5+W6BB3KpIQwzBIezWERncLlLrDCUiX//m97XwbUXrX
N3Xd+KDiRqZvYO3DKIKhh4KeR1CbJUqJFtsg684QnBQUNxe4UZ1xEQu65RtgAGou
HaSCoCjUViHCtFaGjhKwz6zySmHd3ZEmk7kqaYik287V9Icz0Dtuh7TY8GzUBVsw
mTaiU8DTCoFs7dKIrgzE
=FnVY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
10 years, 10 months
FTBFS due to missing sisu-inject-bean
by Michal Srb
Hi guys,
just a quick tip: if you have some FTBFS failures due to missing
artifact org.sonatype.sisu:sisu-inject-bean, the solution is to replace
sisu-inject-bean BR/R with cdi-api1, atinject, aopalliance. Typically
not all of them are needed.
As you probably already know, Fedora switched from Sonatype Sisu to
Eclipse Sisu. Eclipse Sisu doesn't have sisu-inject-bean artifact, but
this artifact contains nothing but bundled classes from atinject,
cdi-api (1.0), aopalliance and possibly others. So replacing R/BR +
patching pom.xml should solve the problem.
Regards
Michal
10 years, 10 months
