perl-devel January 2016

perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
1572 discussions

[Bug 1216928] New: Wrong license declaration
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216928 Bug ID: 1216928 Summary: Wrong license declaration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwouters(a)redhat.com, wjhns174(a)hardakers.net perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23 declares the license as "GPL+ or Artistic". However, there are many files covered by MIT license. For example SEC.pm: =head1 LICENSE Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the name of the author not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific prior written permission. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 1213823] New: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213823 Bug ID: 1213823 Summary: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires nonexistent dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-DNS-SEC Assignee: wjhns174(a)hardakers.net Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pwouters(a)redhat.com, wjhns174(a)hardakers.net # dnf --enablerepo=f23-build install --best perl-Net-DNS-SEC Using metadata from Tue Apr 21 09:46:27 2015 (3:32:54 hours old) Error: nothing provides perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro) needed by perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch buildsys(a)fedoraproject.org robot reports: perl-Net-DNS-SEC has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST::CryptoPro) perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Digest::GOST) >= 0:0.06 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.06 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::ECDSA) >= 0:0.05 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:1.01 perl-Net-DNS-SEC-0.22-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(Crypt::OpenSSL::EC) >= 0:0.5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 12

[Bug 1139141] New: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot does not support ARM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139141 Bug ID: 1139141 Summary: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot does not support ARM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SOOT Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Depends On: 994894 Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM) +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #994894 +++ perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot will be disabled on ARM. --- Additional comment from Petr Pisar on 2013-08-08 08:54:26 GMT --- ARM support disabled in perl-SOOT-0.17-3.fc20. --- perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot run-requires perl-SOOT which is not available on ARM. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485251 [Bug 485251] ExcludeArch Tracker for ARM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894 [Bug 994894] perl-Soot does not support ARM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ShoZg0yQnv&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 7

[Bug 994894] New: perl-Soot does not support ARM
by Red Hat Bugzilla 24 Nov '16

24 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994894 Bug ID: 994894 Summary: perl-Soot does not support ARM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-SOOT Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com Depends On: 991031 Blocks: 485251 (F-ExcludeArch-ARM) perl-Soot requires root which does not support ARM (bug #991031). perl-Soot will be disabled on ARM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CKPzevCLAa&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 9

[Bug 1274105] New: biber-v2.2 is available
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Nov '16

21 Nov '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274105 Bug ID: 1274105 Summary: biber-v2.2 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: biber Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: cbm(a)m.fsf.org Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: cbm(a)m.fsf.org, mefoster(a)gmail.com, novyjindrich(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: v2.2 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.8-12.fc23 URL: http://biblatex-biber.sourceforge.net/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 25

perl-CryptX package
by Denis Fateyev 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

Hello there, I'm going to package CryptX Perl module [1] soon. The only concern is that it contains a lot of XS-based code of ciphers and hashes that can be probably considered as bundled. Mostly the used routines, including sha1, sha2 and md5 implementations, are based on LibTomCrypt library [2, 3]. Neither this library components nor all algo related are mentioned in Bundled library policies [4]. So the question is: should we threat this very case as bundled libs presence? Are there any objections against this module to be packaged "as is", in its current state? Thanks, [1] https://metacpan.org/pod/CryptX [2] http://www.libtom.net [3] https://github.com/libtom/libtomcrypt [4] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries&… -- wbr, Denis.

3 6

[Bug 808197] New: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Nov '16

09 Nov '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808197 Summary: FTBFS: big endian bug in self checks Product: Fedora Version: 17 Platform: powerpc OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: medium Component: perl-Socket-Netlink AssignedTo: bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com, bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Description of problem: perl-Socket-Netlink fails to build on PPC as two of the self checks fail, one of them looks like a big endian bug as the result has a swapped bit: t/12netlink-message-header.t ..... ok # Failed test '$message->attrs after unpack' # at t/13netlink-message-attrs.t line 98. # Structures begin differing at: # $got->{str} = '' # $expected->{str} = 'FGH' # Looks like you failed 1 test of 14. t/13netlink-message-attrs.t ...... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/14 subtests t/14netlink-message-error.t ...... ok # Failed test '$message->pack' # at t/20io-socket-netlink-generic.t line 55. # at bytes 0-0xf (0-15) # got: | 00 00 00 14 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| # exp: | 00 00 00 14 00 00 00 1e 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| # Looks like you failed 1 test of 13. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ppc-koji build --scratch f17 perl-Socket-Netlink-0.03-4.fc17.src.rpm 2. 3. Actual results: http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=469988 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 671445] New: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445 Summary: [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: cpanspec AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org ReportedBy: mmaslano(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: steve(a)silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Created attachment 474630 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474630 add epel option This patch should remove things, which are not needed according to new packaging guidelines and latest rpm eg. defining buildroot. The old behaviour is available under --epel option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 11

[Bug 1231104] New: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-11.fc23: FTBFS with Perl 5.22
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Oct '16

19 Oct '16

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231104 Bug ID: 1231104 Summary: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-11.fc23: FTBFS with Perl 5.22 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV Assignee: psabata(a)redhat.com Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: iarnell(a)gmail.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psabata(a)redhat.com External Bug ID: CPAN 94945 External Bug ID: CPAN 94945 Created attachment 1037926 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1037926&action=edit Build log The build of perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV failed during Perl 5.22 mass rebuild with following errors: + make test "/usr/bin/perl" "-Iinc" "-MModule::Install::ExtraTests" "-e" "Module::Install::ExtraTests::__harness('Test::Harness', 0, 'xt/author', '', '', 0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t Subroutine B::OP::parent redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/B/Utils.pm line 186. # Failed test 'simple callback' # at t/basic.t line 37. # got: '0' # expected: '1' # Failed test 'multiple callbacks' # at t/basic.t line 65. # got: '0' # expected: '2' # Failed test 'no callback after multiple registrations' # at t/basic.t line 68. # got: '0' # expected: '2' # Failed test 'multiple callbacks for multiple entersubs' # at t/basic.t line 78. # got: '0' # expected: '4' # Failed test 'deregistration' # at t/basic.t line 90. # got: '0' # expected: '2' # Looks like you planned 20 tests but ran 11. # Looks like you failed 5 tests of 11 run. t/basic.t ... Dubious, test returned 5 (wstat 1280, 0x500) Failed 14/20 subtests Subroutine B::OP::parent redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/B/Utils.pm line 186. # Failed test at t/import.t line 29. # got: '0' # expected: '2' # Failed test at t/import.t line 33. # got: '0' # expected: '2' # Looks like you planned 9 tests but ran 3. # Looks like you failed 2 tests of 3 run. t/import.t .. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 7

[Bug 807793] New: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Oct '16

07 Oct '16

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807793 Summary: Please build pcsc-perl for EPEL6 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: pcsc-perl AssignedTo: tmraz(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: mjeanson(a)rlnx.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tmraz(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Hi, I was hoping that you could build pcsc-perl for EPEL6. I just tried a scratch build of the fc17 version and it builds without modification within EPEL6. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3940535 Thanks, Michael -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
158
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

perl-devel January 2016