https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234738
Bug ID: 1234738 Summary: perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 FTBFS: gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry> Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-GnuPG Assignee: rc040203@freenet.de Reporter: ppisar@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: lxtnow@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rc040203@freenet.de
perl-Mail-GnuPG-0.21-5.fc23 fails to build in F23 because tests fail:
t/99.pod.t ............... ok gpg-agent[31177]: directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/mgtZOWG1/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d' created gpg-agent[31178]: gpg-agent (GnuPG) 2.1.5 started # GPG_AGENT_INFO: /builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/mgtZOWG1/.gnupg/S.gpg-agent:31178:1 gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry> # Failed test 'signing' # at t/agent.t line 101. # got: '2' # expected: '0' # gpg: problem with the agent - disabling agent use # gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode # gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ... # gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode # gpg: Invalid passphrase; please try again ... # gpg: can't query passphrase in batch mode # gpg: no default secret key: bad passphrase # gpg: signing failed: bad passphrase # Failed test at t/agent.t line 104. # got: '2' # expected: '0' # Failed test at t/agent.t line 105. # got: undef # expected: 'EFEA4EAD' # Failed test at t/agent.t line 106. # got: undef # expected: 'Mail::GnuPG Test Key mail@gnupg.dom' gpg-agent[31178]: command 'GET_PASSPHRASE' failed: No such file or directory <Pinentry> # Failed test at t/agent.t line 115. # got: '2' # expected: '0' Unknown Content-Type or no PGP message in body at /builddir/build/BUILD/Mail-GnuPG-0.21/blib/lib/Mail/GnuPG.pm line 404. # Looks like you planned 20 tests but ran 8. # Looks like you failed 5 tests of 8 run. # Looks like your test exited with 32 just after 8. gpg-agent[31178]: can't connect my own socket: IPC connect call failed gpg-agent[31178]: this process is useless - shutting down t/agent.t ................ Dubious, test returned 32 (wstat 8192, 0x2000) Failed 17/20 subtests
Difference between working and failing build root:
gnupg2 2.1.4-2.fc23 > 2.1.5-1.fc23 tzdata 2015d-1.fc23 > 2015d-3.fc23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234738
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de --- Seem to me as if this package is completely incompatible with gnupg2 > 2.1.5.
Nothing in Fedora seems to use it, so I am inclined to consider retiring it. Opinions?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234738
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|rc040203@freenet.de |extras-orphan@fedoraproject | |.org
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234738
--- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life jkurik@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 23. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '23'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 23 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234738
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Last Closed| |2016-11-24 08:13:50
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- This package was removed from Fedora 23.
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org