On 01/08/2016 11:27 AM, bugzilla@redhat.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904
Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com --- Package approved.
I still have heard nothing from the main python maintainers, and I'd like to get some kind of an ack for the following plan:
- Dropping the python3-pkgversion-macros package, replaced with python-srpm-macros from above and required by redhat-rpm-config (in Fedora) and epel-rpm-macros (in EPEL).
- Dropping the python-macros sub-package from python, replace by Requires: python-rpm-macros from above package. python3 requires this as well.
- Dropping macros.python2 from python-devel, replaced with Requires: python2-rpm-macros from above package.
- Dropping macros.python3 from python3-devel, replaced with Requires: python3-rpm-macros from above package.
This achieves the goal of decoupling modifying/updating the python macros from updating the main python package, which has become a serious hindrance to developing new python rpm macros.
The reviewed package contains the Fedora macros. macros will be changed on the EPEL branches.
I've requested a side tag to do the build in here - https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6331
as I think the timing is tricky and the possibility of breaking the buildroot moderate.