----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Coghlan" ncoghlan@redhat.com To: python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 7:57:21 AM Subject: Re: Python 2.7 SSL upgrade patch available for testing
On 08/07/2014 06:10 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Coghlan" ncoghlan@redhat.com On 07/30/2014 12:16 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
So the question is, are we feeling lucky? :) I'd say yes, since rawhide has just recently become future Fedora 22 and not much is going on in there right now. If we break something, we can just revert it quickly and everything will be fine.
Is someone strictly against this or shall I move on with patching our rawhide Python?
Patching rawhide would be wonderful. The patch is at last passing Python's own test suite, so it shouldn't have broken anything too dramatically.
I am willing to work on this starting next week (atm I am at flock), I will test it along with some ssl dependent packages.
Did anyone get a chance to try this out?
Hi Nick,
sorry for the delay.
I did apply the patch, I have encountered seg fault in unicodeobject.c. Right now I am checking for diffs in upstream 2.7 branch between our unicodeobject.c and theirs.
After that I will update the upstream bug report.
Regards, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan Red Hat Hosted & Shared Services Software Engineering & Development, Brisbane
HSS Provisioning Architect _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
Regards,
Robert Kuska ----------------------------------------------------- rkuska @ #fedora-devel on freenode #brno #gulag #software-collections on brq.redhat