Le mardi 29 novembre 2005 à 11:48 -0500, Stephen Smalley a écrit :
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 08:20 -0800, Tom London wrote:
There are reports in fedora-test about the 2.X policy slowing down udev. (Appears that folks are comparing booting with selinxux=1 with selinux=0).
I have to admit that udev is running slower (targeted/enforcing).
Any validity to this? Known issue? How to track down?
First, check whether you have any avc denials associated with udev in your audit.log.
There are certainly many denials with the new 2.0 policy, including udev stuff (at least it was the case a week ago). I've posted 2.0 audit logs many times in bugzilla.