On 12/31/2010 10:36 PM, Dominick Grift wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 12/28/2010 12:45 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 12/26/2010 05:25 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On Sunday, December 26, 2010 05:25:22 pm Dominick Grift wrote:
is trying to read the state files in /proc for some unconfined_t process
Never thought of /proc. That explains why I found it weird to see a file labeled as unconfined_t. Frank: disregard my previous suggetion>:) -- Jorge -- selinux mailing list selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
What OS/Version are you seeing this in?
dwalsh: looks like fedoras' passenger policy only works for passenger 2.*
recently it seems version 3.* was released which introduced some major changes, causing fedora policy for passenger to completely break.
i started work on a version 3 compatible policy but it is not advancing at all:
http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=domg472/public_git/ruby.git;a=summary
I have already added some support for the version 3 to F13/RHEL6 policy. I will add it also to F14/F15 policy.
Generally I work with "passenger guys" on SELinux policy.
Also I am planning to talk with Michal Fojtik to update his blog.
Also to miroslav: i noticed you have designed current policy for passenger with /var/lib/passenger as the webapp document root. I am of the opinion however that passenger/ror webapps should be labelled https_sys/user/*_script_exec_t just like any other webapp.
selinux mailing list selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk0eWtIACgkQMlxVo39jgT+fCACcCCVcGCOTlUWGzhuL1JsEMvNU ubcAn1xXQAekYXr56w1RRdow4QZ/lSug =I+PL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
selinux mailing list selinux@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux