On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 08:20 -0800, Tom London wrote:
There are reports in fedora-test about the 2.X policy slowing down udev. (Appears that folks are comparing booting with selinxux=1 with selinux=0).
I have to admit that udev is running slower (targeted/enforcing).
Any validity to this? Known issue? How to track down?
libselinux 1.27.28 should help with this slowdown, and further improvement can be had by modifying udev to call matchpathcon_init_prefix() to limit processing to /dev entries.