i suspect that you are confusing raw policy with human readable
policy
gen_tunable(allow_httpd_anon_write, false) versus bool httpd_anon_write false;
etc
Nope. I'll dig up some examples when I get home tonight. As for the
language syntax changes, this is what I meant:
On 22/06/2011 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Now I have the rather unpleasant task of upgrading my own customised
> policy from the FC13 to FC15 version. Are there any changes from FC13 to
> FC15 in terms of the language syntax or anything else I need to be aware
> of before I start?
>
Not that I recall. F16 will add new stuff.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk4CMZ0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNMHwCggv7bZaDAYCwxoja+ek2e9+VC
HaIAoMM9V97gSfccgD9z1QPaqHZ6cZqB
=EYr7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
So, in FC16 there was "new stuff"
added in terms of changes to the
language syntax. As I am upgrading the policy from FC15 to the present
level (FC17) I just wanted to know what this "new stuff" is, that's all.
I've already figured out the if ... else statement additions, which I
don't remember seeing in 3.9 version of the policy, so provided I didn't
get this wrong I'd like to know what else has been added?