On September 19, 2012 15:27:43 Dmitry Makovey wrote:
On September 19, 2012 15:20:17 Dmitry Makovey wrote:
Daniel, you saved my day - I thought that something like that should exist but I completely ommited sepgsql* set as I was under impression that it applied to a completely different functionality. I'll use that instead of my module. Thank you very much.
spoke too soon:
# setsebool sepgsql_enable_pitr_implementation On Could not change active booleans: Invalid boolean
so it sounds like it doesn't exist in RHEL? yet?
ok as per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858406 , Miroslav just added it, so it definitely doesn't exist yet. But it sounds like it is on it's way.. thank you Dan and Dominick for the help. I'll stick with my module for now.
What's the best way of tracking whether above changes made it into RHEL6 policies? Just the changelog?