On 10/29/2013 06:21 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Stephen Gallaghersgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
The first goal of the Working Group process is to plan our governance process for future members of the Server Working Group. I think the place we should start is by gathering a list of requirements that a governance charter will need to keep in mind. I'll list my thoughts below, please raise your own concerns as well.
Proposals in-line; in general, I prefer not worrying about this too much / not inventing too much now, and getting to the real work instead. We can adjust the rules after a few months when we see what is/isn't working.
Agreed
== Voting Members ==
- Number of voting members for the Working Group.
Let's assume to continue with 9.
- How long a term do the voting members serve?
FESCo-like, 2 groups of 1 year each, overlapping for 6 months.
How about not copy other governing structures try a new approach ;)
It's better, more fairer and efficient, to no be voting et all but simply make up the server WG with representatives from each sub community as in one of each from these groups documentation,ambassadors,qa,releng,marketing,design,website and the rest from the server community and have them chose within themselves who will be representing on their behalf and for how long.
Once we as in the initial group members are happy about the transformation process from server application to server "product" from all angles of the related communities as in doc,qa,releng,ambassadors,marketing,website,design and server and have successfully pushed through several products through that process ( to try and tested it ), we step down and let the new governing structure take over.
JBG