Am 23.04.2021 um 02:35 schrieb Adam Williamson adamwill@fedoraproject.org:
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 16:54 +0200, Peter Boy wrote:
I just tested it server dvd install with rc 1.1
„device list“ doesn’t work so inclusion of udisks2-iscsi did not happen.
Should we just wait vor rc 1.2 because the freeze exception was too late for this rc or do we have to do something?
No FE was proposed or approved for iSCSI, AFAICS. The FE that was proposed and accepted:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951062
refers only to udisks2-lvm , and that's what the PR that was merged added:
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/647# if udisks2-iscsi is wanted too, it should've been discussed in the FE and added to the PR.
Sorry, I had slipped in the lines of my notes.
But it’s even worse.
The FE was about Include udisks2-lvm
The correct module name is udisks2-lvm2 (according to dnf search udisks)
In any case, udisks2-lvm2 was not included in rc1, hopefully it is in rc2?
And we have the same issue with additional modules, most important is
udisks2-iscsi.x86_64 : Module for iSCSI
which is an install option and a wider used storage strategy in the server world.
Additional modules are:
udisks2-zram.x86_64 : Module for ZRAM udisks2-lsm.x86_64 : Module for LSM udisks2-bcache.x86_64 : Module for Bcache
I cannot judge their relevance. Maybe no admin is interested in graphical support of the swap area (zram).
Server is also missing udisks2-btrfs.x86_64 : Module for BTRFS
BTRFS is currently not a recommended file system, so we could omit that.
We're about to spin RC2, like, right now. If someone thinks this a big problem and wants to fix it in the next fifteen minutes we can hold off for a bit.
Sorry, my time zone is 6 hours ahead. I am right now starting my day.
Is there a chance for rc3 ?