A partition with mountpoint %s has already been defined

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

So, I logged a bug asking to change the behaviour of pykickstart to 
something that does not bail out and lets us override the "part /" size.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516338

-- Jeroen

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

On 08/08/2009 01:15 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> So, I logged a bug asking to change the behaviour of pykickstart to
> something that does not bail out and lets us override the "part /" size.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516338

Digging a little further, the commit that caused this is
7bea68b8cbd81ce66b18cbec71b85762e0dbb70a, solving bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512956

We may also need to rethink how we want the "part /" to be the size the 
spin maintainer wants (rather then defining it in -base.ks as well as 
the custom spin ks).

If we were to remove the "part /" from -base.ks for example, 
livecd-tools will revert to it's default (4096 at this moment).

Let me know what you think.

Kind regards,

Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 13:24:16 +0200
Jeroen van Meeuwen  wrote:
> On 08/08/2009 01:15 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> > So, I logged a bug asking to change the behaviour of pykickstart to
> > something that does not bail out and lets us override the "part /"
> > size.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516338
>
> Digging a little further, the commit that caused this is
> 7bea68b8cbd81ce66b18cbec71b85762e0dbb70a, solving bug 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512956
>
> We may also need to rethink how we want the "part /" to be the size
> the spin maintainer wants (rather then defining it in -base.ks as
> well as the custom spin ks).
>
> If we were to remove the "part /" from -base.ks for example, 
> livecd-tools will revert to it's default (4096 at this moment).
>
> Let me know what you think.

Looks like Bruno filed this a bit back on the same issue:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515063

Perhaps we can catch Jeremy and see what he would like to do here.

kevin

[Jeroen van Meeuwen]

On 08/08/2009 09:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Looks like Bruno filed this a bit back on the same issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515063

Ah, right. Wrong component, but it was there already when I filed the bug.
> Perhaps we can catch Jeremy and see what he would like to do here.

I think we need Chris Lumens too, since he's the one that introduced 
this new (and honesly; improved) behavior.

-- Jeroen