On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 07:19 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 09:06 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 16:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
And it's also just semantically wrong - the word 'assigned' does not mean 'triaged'.
It can also be a bit annoying when there are multiple maintainers for a package, and it gets "assigned" to the main maintainer. Personally I'd prefer e.g. renaming "new" to "unconfirmed", and "assigned" to "confirmed".
That doesn't work either, though, for the same objection - it's not 'confirmed', it's triaged. We don't require reproduction as part of the triage process.
Well, now I think about it, we could have UNCONFIRMED and CONFIRMED, and a 'Triaged' flag, as those two definitions are different; you can have a bug that's been confirmed but not triaged, and vice versa. And that may actually be useful information. Yay, complications!