On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kamil Paral kparal@redhat.com wrote:
But I also missed his announcement, and when this discussion was renewed, I thought the criterion still wasn't finalized and in effect. It seems I wasn't the only one :o)
I also forgot that I had done it when the discussion picked back up. But yeah, I'm definitely flexible on the timing. I think the reason we went with a number was to avoid getting bogged down in what "reasonable" meant. But the existing criterion has its own ambiguity, so if we can make it better*, we should.
* But what does "better" mean?! :-D