At boot time I get the folowing lines:
Attivazione dell'interfaccia di loopback: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-lo.
Attivazione dell'interfaccia eth0: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth0: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth0: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-eth0.
Attivazione dell'interfaccia eth1: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth1: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth1: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-eth1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avvio di anacron: Could not initialise connection to hald.
Normally this means the HAL daemon (hald) is not running or not ready. _________________________________________________________________
This happens after latest updates of this morning. gen 27 09:43:07 Updated: yum.noarch 3.2.21-4.fc11 gen 27 09:43:08 Updated: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common.noarch 2.2-17.fc11 gen 27 09:43:14 Updated: bash.i386 4.0-rc1.1.fc11 gen 27 09:43:20 Updated: authconfig.i386 5.4.7-1.fc11 gen 27 09:44:02 Updated: dia.i386 1:0.96.1-11.fc11 gen 27 09:44:48 Updated: gedit.i386 1:2.25.5-3.fc11 gen 27 09:45:10 Updated: blender.i386 2.48a-13.fc11 gen 27 09:45:11 Updated: anacron.i386 2.3-66.fc11 gen 27 09:45:12 Updated: createrepo.noarch 0.9.6-5.fc11 gen 27 09:45:13 Updated: ypbind.i386 3:1.20.4-13.fc11 gen 27 09:45:14 Updated: authconfig-gtk.i386 5.4.7-1.fc11 gen 27 10:00:45 Updated: oxygen-icon-theme.noarch 4.2.0-3.fc11 gen 27 10:00:51 Updated: kde-settings.noarch 4.2-1.20090126svn.fc11 gen 27 10:00:55 Updated: kdelibs-common.i386 6:4.2.0-4.fc11 gen 27 10:01:01 Updated: ufraw-common.i386 0.15-1.fc11 gen 27 10:01:57 Updated: selinux-policy.noarch 3.6.3-9.fc11 gen 27 10:02:58 Updated: selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 3.6.3-9.fc11 gen 27 10:03:01 Updated: kde-settings-kdm.noarch 4.2-1.20090126svn.fc11 gen 27 10:03:08 Updated: openssl.i686 0.9.8j-6.fc11 gen 27 10:03:19 Updated: qt.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:03:58 Updated: qt-x11.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:05:27 Updated: kdelibs.i386 6:4.2.0-4.fc11 gen 27 10:05:40 Updated: gtk2.i386 2.15.1-5.fc11 gen 27 10:05:49 Updated: ruby-libs.i386 1.8.6.287-3.fc11 gen 27 10:06:31 Updated: qt-devel.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:06:34 Updated: ruby.i386 1.8.6.287-3.fc11 gen 27 10:06:53 Updated: vim-common.i386 2:7.2.088-1.fc11 gen 27 10:06:54 Updated: vim-enhanced.i386 2:7.2.088-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:20 Updated: gtk2-devel.i386 2.15.1-5.fc11 gen 27 10:07:23 Updated: ufraw-gimp.i386 0.15-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:25 Updated: ufraw.i386 0.15-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:25 Updated: qt-mysql.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:07:26 Updated: vim-minimal.i386 2:7.2.088-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:39 Updated: python-lxml.i386 2.2-0.5.beta2.fc11 gen 27 10:07:52 Updated: openssl-devel.i386 0.9.8j-6.fc11 gen 27 10:08:10 Updated: kdelibs-devel.i386 6:4.2.0-4.fc11 gen 27 10:08:44 Updated: kdebase-runtime.i386 4.2.0-3.fc11 gen 27 10:08:49 Updated: kdebase-runtime-libs.i386 4.2.0-3.fc11 gen 27 10:15:02 Updated: xorg-x11-server-common.i386 1.5.99.901-5.fc11 gen 27 10:15:03 Updated: xorg-x11-server-Xorg.i386 1.5.99.901-5.fc11 gen 27 10:17:19 Updated: kernel-firmware.noarch 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:18:27 Installed: kernel.i686 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:18:35 Updated: kernel-headers.i386 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:18:38 Installed: kernel.i686 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:40:43 Updated: crontabs.noarch 1.10-27.fc11
Tnx for help
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com wrote:
From: Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com Subject: Rawhide: messages at boot time To: "For testers of Fedora Core development releases" fedora-test-list@redhat.com Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 1:57 AM At boot time I get the folowing lines:
Attivazione dell'interfaccia di loopback: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-lo.
Attivazione dell'interfaccia eth0: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth0: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth0: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-eth0.
Attivazione dell'interfaccia eth1: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth1: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-eth1: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-eth1.
Avvio di anacron: Could not initialise connection to hald.
Normally this means the HAL daemon (hald) is not running or not ready. _________________________________________________________________
This happens after latest updates of this morning. gen 27 09:43:07 Updated: yum.noarch 3.2.21-4.fc11 gen 27 09:43:08 Updated: baekmuk-ttf-fonts-common.noarch 2.2-17.fc11 gen 27 09:43:14 Updated: bash.i386 4.0-rc1.1.fc11 gen 27 09:43:20 Updated: authconfig.i386 5.4.7-1.fc11 gen 27 09:44:02 Updated: dia.i386 1:0.96.1-11.fc11 gen 27 09:44:48 Updated: gedit.i386 1:2.25.5-3.fc11 gen 27 09:45:10 Updated: blender.i386 2.48a-13.fc11 gen 27 09:45:11 Updated: anacron.i386 2.3-66.fc11 gen 27 09:45:12 Updated: createrepo.noarch 0.9.6-5.fc11 gen 27 09:45:13 Updated: ypbind.i386 3:1.20.4-13.fc11 gen 27 09:45:14 Updated: authconfig-gtk.i386 5.4.7-1.fc11 gen 27 10:00:45 Updated: oxygen-icon-theme.noarch 4.2.0-3.fc11 gen 27 10:00:51 Updated: kde-settings.noarch 4.2-1.20090126svn.fc11 gen 27 10:00:55 Updated: kdelibs-common.i386 6:4.2.0-4.fc11 gen 27 10:01:01 Updated: ufraw-common.i386 0.15-1.fc11 gen 27 10:01:57 Updated: selinux-policy.noarch 3.6.3-9.fc11 gen 27 10:02:58 Updated: selinux-policy-targeted.noarch 3.6.3-9.fc11 gen 27 10:03:01 Updated: kde-settings-kdm.noarch 4.2-1.20090126svn.fc11 gen 27 10:03:08 Updated: openssl.i686 0.9.8j-6.fc11 gen 27 10:03:19 Updated: qt.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:03:58 Updated: qt-x11.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:05:27 Updated: kdelibs.i386 6:4.2.0-4.fc11 gen 27 10:05:40 Updated: gtk2.i386 2.15.1-5.fc11 gen 27 10:05:49 Updated: ruby-libs.i386 1.8.6.287-3.fc11 gen 27 10:06:31 Updated: qt-devel.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:06:34 Updated: ruby.i386 1.8.6.287-3.fc11 gen 27 10:06:53 Updated: vim-common.i386 2:7.2.088-1.fc11 gen 27 10:06:54 Updated: vim-enhanced.i386 2:7.2.088-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:20 Updated: gtk2-devel.i386 2.15.1-5.fc11 gen 27 10:07:23 Updated: ufraw-gimp.i386 0.15-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:25 Updated: ufraw.i386 0.15-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:25 Updated: qt-mysql.i386 1:4.4.3-13.fc11 gen 27 10:07:26 Updated: vim-minimal.i386 2:7.2.088-1.fc11 gen 27 10:07:39 Updated: python-lxml.i386 2.2-0.5.beta2.fc11 gen 27 10:07:52 Updated: openssl-devel.i386 0.9.8j-6.fc11 gen 27 10:08:10 Updated: kdelibs-devel.i386 6:4.2.0-4.fc11 gen 27 10:08:44 Updated: kdebase-runtime.i386 4.2.0-3.fc11 gen 27 10:08:49 Updated: kdebase-runtime-libs.i386 4.2.0-3.fc11 gen 27 10:15:02 Updated: xorg-x11-server-common.i386 1.5.99.901-5.fc11 gen 27 10:15:03 Updated: xorg-x11-server-Xorg.i386 1.5.99.901-5.fc11 gen 27 10:17:19 Updated: kernel-firmware.noarch 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:18:27 Installed: kernel.i686 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:18:35 Updated: kernel-headers.i386 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:18:38 Installed: kernel.i686 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11 gen 27 10:40:43 Updated: crontabs.noarch 1.10-27.fc11
Tnx for help
-- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag
--
I confirm your findings! Encountered same problems. line 80 of networking, same errors.
[olivares@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.29-0.53.rc2.git1.fc11.i686
encountered a udev message about udev that invalid group 'dialout' or something related. also a selinux denial again for kde* stuff
type=1400 audit(1233103985.049:4): avc: denied { create } for pid=2548 comm="kde4-config" name=".kde" scontext=system_u:system_r:xdm_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 tclass=dir
Regards,
Antonio
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:57:59PM -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com wrote:
From: Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com Subject: Rawhide: messages at boot time To: "For testers of Fedora Core development releases" fedora-test-list@redhat.com Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 1:57 AM At boot time I get the folowing lines:
Attivazione dell'interfaccia di loopback: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-lo.
bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11 is quite broken. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750
This is messing up quite a lot of a startup and tons of scripts "out in the field". Sigh!
At this moment you can only back off to bash-3.2-33.fc11 or anything which sources a file without an explicit PATH will barf on you.
Michal
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:30PM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:57:59PM -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com wrote:
From: Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 1:57 AM At boot time I get the folowing lines:
Attivazione dell'interfaccia di loopback: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-lo.
bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11 is quite broken. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750
It might be worth mentioning, for anyone looking at the bug, the Japanese just says that while in POSIX mode, if it can't find a file in the PATH, it will search the current directory.
2009/1/28 Scott Robbins scottro@nyc.rr.com:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:30PM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 04:57:59PM -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com wrote:
From: Antonio M antonio.montagnani@gmail.com Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 1:57 AM At boot time I get the folowing lines:
Attivazione dell'interfaccia di loopback: ./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
./network-functions: line 80: .: ifcfg-lo: file not found
Missing config file ifcfg-ifcfg-lo.
bash-4.0-rc1.1.fc11 is quite broken. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481750
It might be worth mentioning, for anyone looking at the bug, the Japanese just says that while in POSIX mode, if it can't find a file in the PATH, it will search the current directory.
-- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6
Buffy: I lost a friend tonight and I may lose more! The whole world may be sucked into hell, and you want my help 'cause your girlfriend's a big ho?! Let me take this opportunity to NOT care!
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
Tnx to all. I noted that when I opened for example the Download window I got also the Computer window on my screen Now it is o.k.
encountered a udev message about udev that invalid group 'dialout' or something related.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480762
It's fixed for me today with setup-2.7.7-2.fc11.noarch / udev-137-1.fc11.x86_64.
Avvio di anacron: Could not initialise connection to hald.
Normally this means the HAL daemon (hald) is not running or not ready.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482782
I'm no longer seeing the message with anacron-2.3-67.fc11.x86_64.
-B.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:10:11PM -0500, Christopher Beland wrote:
Avvio di anacron: Could not initialise connection to hald.
Normally this means the HAL daemon (hald) is not running or not ready.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482782
I'm no longer seeing the message with anacron-2.3-67.fc11.x86_64.
This is not really an anacron problem even if after an update it does not trigger such messages anymore. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479180#c5 how to get around that and similar issues. An open question is what should really take care about such rearrangements.
Michal
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 22:59 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
This is not really an anacron problem even if after an update it does not trigger such messages anymore. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479180#c5 how to get around that and similar issues. An open question is what should really take care about such rearrangements.
So according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/20SecondStartup
Upstart is or will hopefully be starting services in parallel. If this is the case, do the S and K numbers in the symlinks in /etc/rc5.d/* really mean much anymore? Would it be a useful smoke test to reverse them all and make sure everything still works?
It would actually be interesting to know whether Fedora is trying the "there are three critical paths" approach to fast booting, or "mostly the same as always with a few tweaks" or "just start everything at once and let the kernel sort it out", or something else?
-B.
Christopher Beland wrote:
So according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/20SecondStartup
Upstart is or will hopefully be starting services in parallel. If this is the case, do the S and K numbers in the symlinks in /etc/rc5.d/* really mean much anymore? Would it be a useful smoke test to reverse them all and make sure everything still works?
It would actually be interesting to know whether Fedora is trying the "there are three critical paths" approach to fast booting, or "mostly the same as always with a few tweaks" or "just start everything at once and let the kernel sort it out", or something else?
-B.
I'm missing the point, sorry. A happy me is a machine that does requested tasks faster. I boot my laptop once a day, on average. Go pour a cup of coffee and do my morning devotions then come and check e-mail. My dev servers get booted twice a month or so. If someone is thinking to change the init process so that you break lots of stuff to get sub-20 second boots, I think the focus is way off.
There's nothing wrong with poking rpc to see why so many reads are done but you will waste many person-weeks of time getting folks moved to some "thing" so they can save a few seconds here.
Leam
On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 14:57 -0500, Leam Hall wrote:
I'm missing the point, sorry. A happy me is a machine that does requested tasks faster. I boot my laptop once a day, on average. Go pour a cup of coffee and do my morning devotions then come and check e-mail. My dev servers get booted twice a month or so. If someone is thinking to change the init process so that you break lots of stuff to get sub-20 second boots, I think the focus is way off.
There's nothing wrong with poking rpc to see why so many reads are done but you will waste many person-weeks of time getting folks moved to some "thing" so they can save a few seconds here.
I actually quite appreciate the work that is being done on this issue. When I reboot because I'm forced to because of an update or crash, I want to get back to work as soon as possible, not wander around the house or the office waiting for my computer to restart. Fast booting is especially useful when I bring my laptop to meetings, so I don't keep people waiting to get the thing started.
It's not just about the time saved, it's about avoiding frustration and annoyance, which I think is worth the effort. Especially since it does influence people's choice of operating system.
-B.
On Saturday 31 January 2009 01:56:42 am Christopher Beland wrote:
Upstart is or will hopefully be starting services in parallel. If this is the case, do the S and K numbers in the symlinks in /etc/rc5.d/* really mean much anymore? Would it be a useful smoke test to reverse them all and make sure everything still works?
Not sure that would be helpful. The audit daemon needs to start very early. Rsyslog needs to start very early. etc.
-Steve
Christopher Beland (beland@alum.mit.edu) said:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/20SecondStartup
Upstart is or will hopefully be starting services in parallel.
Well, that's likely dependent on a new upstart we don't have yet.
If this is the case, do the S and K numbers in the symlinks in /etc/rc5.d/* really mean much anymore? Would it be a useful smoke test to reverse them all and make sure everything still works?
No. In the absence of anything else to determine dependencies at runtime, they're still needed.
Bill
-
Antonio M -
Antonio Olivares -
Bill Nottingham -
Christopher Beland -
Leam Hall -
Michal Jaegermann -
Scott Robbins -
Steve Grubb